You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life.

#20

August 27th 06, 02:41 PM posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap,alt.usenet.kooks

an old friend an old friend is offline

external usenet poster

First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006

Posts: 954

You'll certainy never have to use CW to save a life.

Slow Code wrote:
"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
om...
The Kat wrote:
WHY in the **** are you continuing this thread in a SCANNER newsgroup??

Why in the @!#$% are you posting the identical objection
five times in an ANTENNA newsgroup??

Keep this crap out of rec.radio.amateur.policy!!!

enjoying your trolling SC at least this is on topic unlike most of your
crap

Reply With Quote

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life.	Slow Code	Policy	189	December 14th 06 10:46 AM
You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life.	Slow Code	Antenna	58	September 17th 06 03:11 AM
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?	RLW	General	3	August 26th 06 09:16 PM
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?	Slow Code	Shortwave	42	August 23rd 06 02:28 PM
If you had to die to save someone's life, would that person send CW?	Buck	Antenna	0	July 21st 06 07:29 AM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:59 AM.

Menu

About Us