You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life.

August 27th 06, 04:24 PM posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap

Kurt Ullman Kurt Ullman is offline

external usenet poster

First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2006

Posts: 10

You'll certainly never have to use CW to save a life.

In article ,
"Jack Ricci" wrote:

Logically, the fantastically unlikely is the one thing you SHOULD be
prepared for. According to Murphy, whatever can go wrong, WILL go wrong,
and at the least opportune time.
"Brenda Ann" wrote in message
...

...That is exactly why I fill in and buy two identical 6/49 lottery tickets,
and give one away to a cute waitress as a tip on our wedding anniversary. I
love reverse psychology...Ooops! Wrong newsgroup...

You're married to a cute waitress? Cool (g)

Reply With Quote

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life.	Slow Code	Policy	189	December 14th 06 10:46 AM
You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life.	Slow Code	Antenna	58	September 17th 06 03:11 AM
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?	RLW	General	3	August 26th 06 09:16 PM
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?	Slow Code	Shortwave	42	August 23rd 06 02:28 PM
If you had to die to save someone's life, would that person send CW?	Buck	Antenna	0	July 21st 06 07:29 AM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:01 PM.

Menu

About Us