Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
 

I could support that.

SC

Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
 

On Thu, 07 Sep 2006 23:50:10 GMT, Slow Code spake
thusly:


I could support that.

I could not.

Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
 

"Slow Code" wrote in message
nk.net...

I could support that.

SC

Even if the no-code ticket was made 6 months or 2 years
in active length it would not matter one bit. Amateur radio
in the public eye is unknown and your average young person
is far more interested in the Internet, online video, instant text
messaging and cellphones. There are too many commercially
available technologies, which are far cheaper I may add, than
amateur radio which while a curosity is still a functionally and
technologically obsolete pursuit. Sorry but that's the truth.

Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
 

No support.

"Slow Code" wrote in message nk.net...

I could support that.

SC

--

SeeYaa:) Harbin Osteen KG6URO

When American Citizens with dual citizenship pledges allegiance
to the flag, to which flag do they pledge allegiance too?

-

Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
 

Get a life......
"Slow Code" wrote in message
nk.net...

I could support that.

SC

Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
 

The hobby is dead because of all these old ham geriatrics stuck on
code. No one in the real world gives a **** about code.
Slow Code wrote:
I could support that.

SC

Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
 

Douche Bag wrote:
The hobby is dead because of all these old ham geriatrics stuck on
code. No one in the real world gives a **** about code.

not dead dispite the efforts folks like the arrl and slow code to kill
it

Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
 

On 8 Sep 2006 19:28:20 -0700, "Douche Bag"
wrote:

The hobby is dead because of all these old ham geriatrics stuck on
code. No one in the real world gives a **** about code.
Slow Code wrote:
I could support that.

SC

Code is dead - along with anything else that requires skill, practice, or
a little bit of effort.

The folks who want to do away with code should at least learn it and
try it - they might find it to be (gasp) enjoyable. Personally, I could
support doing away with no-code licensing altogether. I realize it won't
happen, but I gotta think that if I managed to learn Morse code, then so
can "they". The only thing no-code licensing accomplished in this neck of
the woods was to move the CB mentality from 11 to 2 meters.

--
-fb-

Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
 

"etagg" wrote in
:

Get a life......


Get a real license.

Sc

Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
 

funkbastler wrote in
:

On 8 Sep 2006 19:28:20 -0700, "Douche Bag"
wrote:

The hobby is dead because of all these old ham geriatrics stuck on
code. No one in the real world gives a **** about code.
Slow Code wrote:
I could support that.

SC

Code is dead - along with anything else that requires skill, practice,
or a little bit of effort.

The folks who want to do away with code should at least learn it and
try it - they might find it to be (gasp) enjoyable. Personally, I could
support doing away with no-code licensing altogether. I realize it
won't happen, but I gotta think that if I managed to learn Morse code,
then so can "they". The only thing no-code licensing accomplished in
this neck of the woods was to move the CB mentality from 11 to 2 meters.


There is no arguing that. KB9RQZ is living proof.

SC