U-Know-Who wrote:
wrote in message
news
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:36:42 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 08:05:16 -0400, Dave wrote:

Cecil Moore wrote:

Dave wrote:

NO! I can't have a QSO with a no-code ham.
They can't copy CW!!! So, No QSO!


So you wouldn't respond to a Mayday and save a life?
Nice guy.

How does one say mayday on CW? My radio only works on the bottom 25 KHz
of the
HF bands.
then you are a porrly equiped ham and should turn your license in for
the good of the ars
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/
I am fairly well equipped: IC-756 Pro III, IC-746, AL-80B amplifier,
ANC-4 noise
canceller, MFJ 1025 Signal enhancer, TS-570D, AMP SUPPLY LK-450
Amplifier, G-707
[2 & 440], plus computer ... and these are the things on my operating
table.

What do you use the AL-80B for? You are not licensed to use it.

Looks like Markie going to get a letter from the FCC.

On 9/29/06 6:07 PM, in article
, "Cecil Moore"
wrote:

Dave wrote:
NO! I can't have a QSO with a no-code ham.
They can't copy CW!!! So, No QSO!

So you wouldn't respond to a Mayday and save a life?
Nice guy.

Clever of you to define a special case after the fact, to show what an ass
you are.

Don

On 9/29/06 6:09 PM, in article
, "an old freind"
wrote:


Cecil Moore wrote:
Dave wrote:
NO! I can't have a QSO with a no-code ham.
They can't copy CW!!! So, No QSO!

So you wouldn't respond to a Mayday and save a life?
Nice guy.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com
the procoders are more interested in their idleogy than lives always
have been it seems


Ditto for you clever fellow too.

Don Bowey wrote:

"Cecil Moore" wrote:

Dave wrote:
NO! I can't have a QSO with a no-code ham.
They can't copy CW!!! So, No QSO!

So you wouldn't respond to a Mayday and save a life?
Nice guy.

Clever of you to define a special case after the fact, ...

Refusing to QSO with anyone on SSB doesn't sound like
a special case - sounds like SOP to me.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

A question well stated, Slow Code...
No, it is a telephone conversation. Period. And that is what the whole hobby
will turn into if the self-righteous, lazy whiners get their way and code
is, once and for all, abolished. They all have contributed to the hobby's
deterioration so far and don't like the fact that a few of us have got their
number and can assess them for what they are. What do these simple-minded
idiots think will happen if, as they press forward, they get all testing
removed? The simple fact is that this is all a set up so the frequencies can
be auctioned to non ham interests. The morons in Newington whimper about the
reduced ham population. Geez Louise...there are many times more hams today
(including those with the "faux" ham licenses not requiring code) than in
the post WWII ham "boom." Not enough?

No kids...this whole code thing and the watering down of the test is simply
a matter dividing and conquering so "they" can come in and tell us that our
numbers don't justify the spectrum. Then...pfssssst!!!...there goes one band
after another.

If any of the no coders had any balls they'd be asking the fcc for real
testing and redevelop the hobby into what it used to be instead of the inane
weekend contesting and buffoons sitting there are sideband comparing which
rigs have the most features.

Idiots.




What's wrong with that,
eslewhere you denied being arogant mr 2 faced
if it helps motivate people to be better hams.
Unfortunately, most here don't want better hams.
I certainly do which is why I call for you Steve and woger to turn in
your licenses

please help out ham radio and turn yours in SC


If two no-code hams contact each other on CB, is that a real QSO?

SC

Smokey wrote:
If any of the no coders had any balls they'd be asking the fcc for real
testing and redevelop the hobby into what it used to ...

Oh yeah, I really miss the days when the grouchy old
AM hams ceaselessly complained loud and long about those
"Single Side-Winders" on their personal AM frequencies
with that new fangled Mickey Mouse mode from hell (SSB).
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Billy cumgobbler Smith wrote:

U-Know-Who wrote:

wrote in message
news
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:36:42 -0400, wrote:


On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 08:05:16 -0400, Dave wrote:


Cecil Moore wrote:


Dave wrote:


NO! I can't have a QSO with a no-code ham.
They can't copy CW!!! So, No QSO!


So you wouldn't respond to a Mayday and save a life?
Nice guy.

How does one say mayday on CW? My radio only works on the bottom 25 KHz
of the
HF bands.

then you are a porrly equiped ham and should turn your license in for
the good of the ars
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

I am fairly well equipped: IC-756 Pro III, IC-746, AL-80B amplifier,
ANC-4 noise
canceller, MFJ 1025 Signal enhancer, TS-570D, AMP SUPPLY LK-450
Amplifier, G-707
[2 & 440], plus computer ... and these are the things on my operating
table.

What do you use the AL-80B for? You are not licensed to use it.


Looks like Markie going to get a letter from the FCC.



Scheissman is just jealous that he can't afford to buy an AL-80B. After
all, he barely paid for that FT-920 that he sponged out of Marie. Not
that it makes that much difference because he can't put up a decent
station ro any sort of a signal. Ever notice how you never hear him on
the air. Is it because he is such a social pariah that no one wants to
talk to him. So much for that ham license. Not much good unless you can
use it, huh Scheissman.

Billy Smith wrote:
Billy cumgobbler Smith wrote:

U-Know-Who wrote:

wrote in message
news
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:36:42 -0400, wrote:


On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 08:05:16 -0400, Dave wrote:


Cecil Moore wrote:


Dave wrote:


NO! I can't have a QSO with a no-code ham.
They can't copy CW!!! So, No QSO!


So you wouldn't respond to a Mayday and save a life?
Nice guy.

How does one say mayday on CW? My radio only works on the bottom 25 KHz
of the
HF bands.

then you are a porrly equiped ham and should turn your license in for
the good of the ars
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

I am fairly well equipped: IC-756 Pro III, IC-746, AL-80B amplifier,
ANC-4 noise
canceller, MFJ 1025 Signal enhancer, TS-570D, AMP SUPPLY LK-450
Amplifier, G-707
[2 & 440], plus computer ... and these are the things on my operating
table.

What do you use the AL-80B for? You are not licensed to use it.


Looks like Markie going to get a letter from the FCC.



Scheissman is just jealous that he can't afford to buy an AL-80B.

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Billy ****s up again!


After
all, he barely paid for that FT-920 that he sponged out of Marie.

If he "sponged" it then he didn't have to "barely pay" for it. Too bad
for you he bought it.
Unlike you who has to get second and third hand used equipment, he can
afford new equipment.

Not that it makes that much difference because he can't put up a decent
station ro any sort of a signal.

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA "ro any sort of signal?"
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:

get flush mr Turd

Chuck Harris wrote in
:

Slow Code wrote:
wrote in
news
How does one say mayday on CW? My radio only works on the bottom 25
KHz of the HF bands.
then you are a porrly equiped ham and should turn your license in for
the good of the ars
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/
I am fairly well equipped: IC-756 Pro III, IC-746, AL-80B amplifier,
ANC-4 noise
canceller, MFJ 1025 Signal enhancer, TS-570D, AMP SUPPLY LK-450
Amplifier, G-707
[2 & 440], plus computer ... and these are the things on my operating
table.


IC-706 MKIIg & AH-4 in the mobile. Plus 2 HTs.
then you are a lying in claiming your radio only work on the bottom 25
khz


WOW Mark,

And you're not even a Real ham.

There is this pithy little thing I found in the ARRL Handbook:

The Amateur's Code
------------------

The Radio Amateur is

CONSIDERATE...never knowingly operates in such a way as to lessen
the pleasure of others.

LOYAL.........offers loyalty, encouragement and support to other
amateurs,
local clubs, and the American Radio Relay League, through
which Amateur Radio in the United States is represented
nationally and internationally.

PROGRESSIVE...with knowledge abreast of science, a well-built and
efficient station and operation above reproach.

FRIENDLY......slow and patient operating when requested; friendly advice
and counsel to the beginner; kindly assistance,
cooperation and consideration for the interests of
others. These are the hallmarks of the amateur spirit.

BALANCED......radio is an avocation, never interfering with duties owed
to family, job, school or community.

PATRIOTIC.....station and skill always ready for service to country and
community.

--The original Amateur's Code was written by Paul M. Segal, W9EEA, in
1928.

Kind of old, and flavored a lot like the US was during the time, but
never-the-less, it has some important lessons in behavior and compassion
that seem to be lacking in your vision for the hobby.

-Chuck Harris



Thanks for posting that chuck. I've never broken any of those on the air
or on usenet. Maybe now Markie and everyone else will see why CW is
important.

Thanks again and Keep up the good work.

73 de Slow Code