| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
Or is it like talking to someone on CB?
SC |
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
I'm relatively new to the group, but I can already tell you're the group
troll. Having been active in the rec.photo groups for sometime, I understand trolls, but at least you have a beef with something tangible. Let's face it. You most likely are one of those who got their General at 13 WPM, maybe their Extra at 20 and hate the no coders and those who got their license by only taking code at 5WPM. Well, who cares. It's time for you to accept reality and come to the conclusion, you out lived Morse Code. Get on with life. Jim Philopena KB1NXE - Formerly KA1VGP, DA2PJ and WN1VJW If you have a Call Book with that last one in it, you have definitely out live Morse Code - time to get back to ashes and dust. "Slow Code" wrote in message ink.net... Or is it like talking to someone on CB? SC |
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
James Philopena wrote: If you have a Call Book with that last one in it, you have definitely out live Morse Code - time to get back to ashes and dust. Welcome. I've always said that a healthy application of the actuarial tables will take care of most of the grumblers... |
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
On 9/26/06 4:15 PM, in article
et, "Slow Code" wrote: Or is it like talking to someone on CB? SC No, not at all. There is a lot less cussing, spitting, passing of gas into the mike, usually no electronic sound effects, and rarely a "10-4 good buddy." I'd say the average ham has an 80 point higher IQ, than the average Cber. Don |
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
Slow Code wrote: Or is it like talking to someone on CB? If the applicable FCC rules and good amateur operating practice are followed, it's a real QSO. Why wouldn't it be? |
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
|
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
"Slow Code" wrote in message ink.net... Or is it like talking to someone on CB? SC You should make a visit to Terrel Owens pharmacist soon. |
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
Talking to a "no code" is like addressing someone given an honorary degree
as "doctor." |
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
"Smokey" wrote in message ... Talking to a "no code" is like addressing someone given an honorary degree as "doctor." How? In that nobody does it? Bad simile, OM. |
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
Huh? Ingles, por favor...no comprehende. Can you communicate in English?
"Sal M. Onella" wrote in message news:veISg.166$gM1.148@fed1read12... How? In that nobody does it? Bad simile, OM. |
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
|
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
|
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
Slow Code wrote: Or is it like talking to someone on CB? SC The answer is "yes it is a real contact" and so far as you were communicating with some one using a radio it also is "like talking to someone on CB." Dude, your arrogance is showing. AC7PN |
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
Slow Code wrote:
Or is it like talking to someone on CB? SC NO! I can't have a QSO with a no-code ham. They can't copy CW!!! So, No QSO! |
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
|
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
NO! I can't have a QSO with a no-code ham.
They can't copy CW!!! So, No QSO! How do you know? Just because they aren't licensed doesn't mean they can't copy CW. My officemate has no license at all but thanks to the military can probably copy better than I can. I'm not licensed to do LOTS of things that I can do. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
NO! I can't have a QSO with a no-code ham.
They can't copy CW!!! So, No QSO! Many use "QSO" as a signifier of a "Voice" contact as well, so "why" couldn't you have a "QSO" with a "NO CODE" Tech? Now, if the question were a QSO with one on a band he wasn't licensed to use, then the answer "could" be NO. BUT - if he has a "Control Operator" there with him to allow his use of that band, then by all means - the answer is still "yes". Its all in how it is looked at. Too many people split hairs............ |
If two no-code hams contact each other on CB, is that a real QSO?
"AC7PN" wrote in
ups.com: Slow Code wrote: Or is it like talking to someone on CB? SC The answer is "yes it is a real contact" and so far as you were communicating with some one using a radio it also is "like talking to someone on CB." Dude, your arrogance is showing. AC7PN What's wrong with that, if it helps motivate people to be better hams. Unfortunately, most here don't want better hams. SC |
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
Dave wrote:
NO! I can't have a QSO with a no-code ham. They can't copy CW!!! So, No QSO! So you wouldn't respond to a Mayday and save a life? Nice guy. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
Cecil Moore wrote: Dave wrote: NO! I can't have a QSO with a no-code ham. They can't copy CW!!! So, No QSO! So you wouldn't respond to a Mayday and save a life? Nice guy. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com the procoders are more interested in their idleogy than lives always have been it seems |
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
Cecil Moore wrote:
Dave wrote: NO! I can't have a QSO with a no-code ham. They can't copy CW!!! So, No QSO! So you wouldn't respond to a Mayday and save a life? Nice guy. How does one say mayday on CW? My radio only works on the bottom 25 KHz of the HF bands. |
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
Dave wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote: So you wouldn't respond to a Mayday and save a life? Nice guy. How does one say mayday on CW? My radio only works on the bottom 25 KHz of the HF bands. Telephony has saved magnitudes more lives than CW. If you are CW only, you are not properly equipped to even attempt to save lives. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
"Dave" wrote in message
... Cecil Moore wrote: Dave wrote: NO! I can't have a QSO with a no-code ham. They can't copy CW!!! So, No QSO! So you wouldn't respond to a Mayday and save a life? Nice guy. How does one say mayday on CW? My radio only works on the bottom 25 KHz of the HF bands. Hmmmmmm - my how we belabor a point. MAYDAY IN CW = SOS............ SOS is usually sent in those cases. SOS for the CW and Mayday for radiotelephone. MAYDAY is "also" asked about in some RadioTelephone license exams for "marine" use and is even becoming part of the Fire service. There is a test specifically for "Mayday" and its uses. Mayday is "generally" used in "airplane" emergencies. |
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
wrote:
SNIPPED then you are a lying in claiming your radio only work on the bottom 25 khz http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ NOPE!! 3500 - 3525 7000 - 7025 10.1 - 10.15 14.0 - 14.025 18.068 - 18.110 21.000 - 21.025 That is where they run. That's a fact you can't deny. They have capability that exceeds my requirements, but that is where they run. And you still crossed posted to more than r.r.a.m. When are you going to learn? You don't want to invest time and energy in learning code and YOU STILL CAN'T FIGURE OUT HOW TO POST TO ONE GROUP. How does your cross posting ignorance contribute to r.r.a.a? How does your cross posting ignorance contribute to r.r.a.b? How does your cross posting ignorance contribute to r.r.a.p? How does your cross posting prejudice contribute to r.r.s? We know how your prejudice contributes to r.r.a.m /s/ DD |
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
|
If two no-code hams contact each other on CB, is that a real QSO?
|
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
wrote in :
How does one say mayday on CW? My radio only works on the bottom 25 KHz of the HF bands. then you are a porrly equiped ham and should turn your license in for the good of the ars http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ I am fairly well equipped: IC-756 Pro III, IC-746, AL-80B amplifier, ANC-4 noise canceller, MFJ 1025 Signal enhancer, TS-570D, AMP SUPPLY LK-450 Amplifier, G-707 [2 & 440], plus computer ... and these are the things on my operating table. IC-706 MKIIg & AH-4 in the mobile. Plus 2 HTs. then you are a lying in claiming your radio only work on the bottom 25 khz WOW Mark, And you're not even a Real ham. SC |
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
Slow Code wrote:
wrote in : How does one say mayday on CW? My radio only works on the bottom 25 KHz of the HF bands. then you are a porrly equiped ham and should turn your license in for the good of the ars http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ I am fairly well equipped: IC-756 Pro III, IC-746, AL-80B amplifier, ANC-4 noise canceller, MFJ 1025 Signal enhancer, TS-570D, AMP SUPPLY LK-450 Amplifier, G-707 [2 & 440], plus computer ... and these are the things on my operating table. IC-706 MKIIg & AH-4 in the mobile. Plus 2 HTs. then you are a lying in claiming your radio only work on the bottom 25 khz WOW Mark, And you're not even a Real ham. There is this pithy little thing I found in the ARRL Handbook: The Amateur's Code ------------------ The Radio Amateur is CONSIDERATE...never knowingly operates in such a way as to lessen the pleasure of others. LOYAL.........offers loyalty, encouragement and support to other amateurs, local clubs, and the American Radio Relay League, through which Amateur Radio in the United States is represented nationally and internationally. PROGRESSIVE...with knowledge abreast of science, a well-built and efficient station and operation above reproach. FRIENDLY......slow and patient operating when requested; friendly advice and counsel to the beginner; kindly assistance, cooperation and consideration for the interests of others. These are the hallmarks of the amateur spirit. BALANCED......radio is an avocation, never interfering with duties owed to family, job, school or community. PATRIOTIC.....station and skill always ready for service to country and community. --The original Amateur's Code was written by Paul M. Segal, W9EEA, in 1928. Kind of old, and flavored a lot like the US was during the time, but never-the-less, it has some important lessons in behavior and compassion that seem to be lacking in your vision for the hobby. -Chuck Harris |
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
wrote in message ... On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:36:42 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 08:05:16 -0400, Dave wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: Dave wrote: NO! I can't have a QSO with a no-code ham. They can't copy CW!!! So, No QSO! So you wouldn't respond to a Mayday and save a life? Nice guy. How does one say mayday on CW? My radio only works on the bottom 25 KHz of the HF bands. then you are a porrly equiped ham and should turn your license in for the good of the ars http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ I am fairly well equipped: IC-756 Pro III, IC-746, AL-80B amplifier, ANC-4 noise canceller, MFJ 1025 Signal enhancer, TS-570D, AMP SUPPLY LK-450 Amplifier, G-707 [2 & 440], plus computer ... and these are the things on my operating table. What do you use the AL-80B for? You are not licensed to use it. |
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
U-Know-Who wrote: wrote in message ... On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:36:42 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 08:05:16 -0400, Dave wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: Dave wrote: NO! I can't have a QSO with a no-code ham. They can't copy CW!!! So, No QSO! So you wouldn't respond to a Mayday and save a life? Nice guy. How does one say mayday on CW? My radio only works on the bottom 25 KHz of the HF bands. then you are a porrly equiped ham and should turn your license in for the good of the ars http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ I am fairly well equipped: IC-756 Pro III, IC-746, AL-80B amplifier, ANC-4 noise canceller, MFJ 1025 Signal enhancer, TS-570D, AMP SUPPLY LK-450 Amplifier, G-707 [2 & 440], plus computer ... and these are the things on my operating table. What do you use the AL-80B for? You are not licensed to use it. Looks like Markie going to get a letter from the FCC. |
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
On 9/29/06 6:07 PM, in article
, "Cecil Moore" wrote: Dave wrote: NO! I can't have a QSO with a no-code ham. They can't copy CW!!! So, No QSO! So you wouldn't respond to a Mayday and save a life? Nice guy. Clever of you to define a special case after the fact, to show what an ass you are. Don |
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
On 9/29/06 6:09 PM, in article
, "an old freind" wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: Dave wrote: NO! I can't have a QSO with a no-code ham. They can't copy CW!!! So, No QSO! So you wouldn't respond to a Mayday and save a life? Nice guy. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com the procoders are more interested in their idleogy than lives always have been it seems Ditto for you clever fellow too. |
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
Don Bowey wrote:
"Cecil Moore" wrote: Dave wrote: NO! I can't have a QSO with a no-code ham. They can't copy CW!!! So, No QSO! So you wouldn't respond to a Mayday and save a life? Nice guy. Clever of you to define a special case after the fact, ... Refusing to QSO with anyone on SSB doesn't sound like a special case - sounds like SOP to me. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
If two no-code hams contact each other on CB, is that a real QSO?
A question well stated, Slow Code...
No, it is a telephone conversation. Period. And that is what the whole hobby will turn into if the self-righteous, lazy whiners get their way and code is, once and for all, abolished. They all have contributed to the hobby's deterioration so far and don't like the fact that a few of us have got their number and can assess them for what they are. What do these simple-minded idiots think will happen if, as they press forward, they get all testing removed? The simple fact is that this is all a set up so the frequencies can be auctioned to non ham interests. The morons in Newington whimper about the reduced ham population. Geez Louise...there are many times more hams today (including those with the "faux" ham licenses not requiring code) than in the post WWII ham "boom." Not enough? No kids...this whole code thing and the watering down of the test is simply a matter dividing and conquering so "they" can come in and tell us that our numbers don't justify the spectrum. Then...pfssssst!!!...there goes one band after another. If any of the no coders had any balls they'd be asking the fcc for real testing and redevelop the hobby into what it used to be instead of the inane weekend contesting and buffoons sitting there are sideband comparing which rigs have the most features. Idiots. What's wrong with that, eslewhere you denied being arogant mr 2 faced if it helps motivate people to be better hams. Unfortunately, most here don't want better hams. I certainly do which is why I call for you Steve and woger to turn in your licenses please help out ham radio and turn yours in SC If two no-code hams contact each other on CB, is that a real QSO? SC |
If two no-code hams contact each other on CB, is that a realQSO?
Smokey wrote:
If any of the no coders had any balls they'd be asking the fcc for real testing and redevelop the hobby into what it used to ... Oh yeah, I really miss the days when the grouchy old AM hams ceaselessly complained loud and long about those "Single Side-Winders" on their personal AM frequencies with that new fangled Mickey Mouse mode from hell (SSB). -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
Billy cumgobbler Smith wrote:
U-Know-Who wrote: wrote in message . .. On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:36:42 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 08:05:16 -0400, Dave wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: Dave wrote: NO! I can't have a QSO with a no-code ham. They can't copy CW!!! So, No QSO! So you wouldn't respond to a Mayday and save a life? Nice guy. How does one say mayday on CW? My radio only works on the bottom 25 KHz of the HF bands. then you are a porrly equiped ham and should turn your license in for the good of the ars http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ I am fairly well equipped: IC-756 Pro III, IC-746, AL-80B amplifier, ANC-4 noise canceller, MFJ 1025 Signal enhancer, TS-570D, AMP SUPPLY LK-450 Amplifier, G-707 [2 & 440], plus computer ... and these are the things on my operating table. What do you use the AL-80B for? You are not licensed to use it. Looks like Markie going to get a letter from the FCC. Scheissman is just jealous that he can't afford to buy an AL-80B. After all, he barely paid for that FT-920 that he sponged out of Marie. Not that it makes that much difference because he can't put up a decent station ro any sort of a signal. Ever notice how you never hear him on the air. Is it because he is such a social pariah that no one wants to talk to him. So much for that ham license. Not much good unless you can use it, huh Scheissman. |
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
Billy Smith wrote: Billy cumgobbler Smith wrote: U-Know-Who wrote: wrote in message . .. On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:36:42 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 08:05:16 -0400, Dave wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: Dave wrote: NO! I can't have a QSO with a no-code ham. They can't copy CW!!! So, No QSO! So you wouldn't respond to a Mayday and save a life? Nice guy. How does one say mayday on CW? My radio only works on the bottom 25 KHz of the HF bands. then you are a porrly equiped ham and should turn your license in for the good of the ars http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ I am fairly well equipped: IC-756 Pro III, IC-746, AL-80B amplifier, ANC-4 noise canceller, MFJ 1025 Signal enhancer, TS-570D, AMP SUPPLY LK-450 Amplifier, G-707 [2 & 440], plus computer ... and these are the things on my operating table. What do you use the AL-80B for? You are not licensed to use it. Looks like Markie going to get a letter from the FCC. Scheissman is just jealous that he can't afford to buy an AL-80B. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Billy ****s up again! After all, he barely paid for that FT-920 that he sponged out of Marie. If he "sponged" it then he didn't have to "barely pay" for it. Too bad for you he bought it. Unlike you who has to get second and third hand used equipment, he can afford new equipment. Not that it makes that much difference because he can't put up a decent station ro any sort of a signal. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA "ro any sort of signal?" BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! |
get flush mr Turd
Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote: get flush mr Turd |
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
Chuck Harris wrote in
: Slow Code wrote: wrote in : How does one say mayday on CW? My radio only works on the bottom 25 KHz of the HF bands. then you are a porrly equiped ham and should turn your license in for the good of the ars http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ I am fairly well equipped: IC-756 Pro III, IC-746, AL-80B amplifier, ANC-4 noise canceller, MFJ 1025 Signal enhancer, TS-570D, AMP SUPPLY LK-450 Amplifier, G-707 [2 & 440], plus computer ... and these are the things on my operating table. IC-706 MKIIg & AH-4 in the mobile. Plus 2 HTs. then you are a lying in claiming your radio only work on the bottom 25 khz WOW Mark, And you're not even a Real ham. There is this pithy little thing I found in the ARRL Handbook: The Amateur's Code ------------------ The Radio Amateur is CONSIDERATE...never knowingly operates in such a way as to lessen the pleasure of others. LOYAL.........offers loyalty, encouragement and support to other amateurs, local clubs, and the American Radio Relay League, through which Amateur Radio in the United States is represented nationally and internationally. PROGRESSIVE...with knowledge abreast of science, a well-built and efficient station and operation above reproach. FRIENDLY......slow and patient operating when requested; friendly advice and counsel to the beginner; kindly assistance, cooperation and consideration for the interests of others. These are the hallmarks of the amateur spirit. BALANCED......radio is an avocation, never interfering with duties owed to family, job, school or community. PATRIOTIC.....station and skill always ready for service to country and community. --The original Amateur's Code was written by Paul M. Segal, W9EEA, in 1928. Kind of old, and flavored a lot like the US was during the time, but never-the-less, it has some important lessons in behavior and compassion that seem to be lacking in your vision for the hobby. -Chuck Harris Thanks for posting that chuck. I've never broken any of those on the air or on usenet. Maybe now Markie and everyone else will see why CW is important. Thanks again and Keep up the good work. 73 de Slow Code |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:29 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com