| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Would you call a person with a PhD in brain surgery "lazy" if he
didn't want to learn Yes I would |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I missed it. What is offered to "swap?"
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"OCEANRADIO" wrote in message ... I missed it. What is offered to "swap?" Well, some want to swap their converted 10m rigs for all band HF rigs... does that count? ![]() |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
ideas
jokes hope "OCEANRADIO" wrote in message ... I missed it. What is offered to "swap?" |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bill Turner" wrote in message ... Me wrote: I would like to ask the "old timers" as to how many of you have recently, within the last 3 years, have actually taken someone aside and offered to try and teach them cw??? ____________________ Perhaps a better question would be: "How many of you old timers have had people express an interest in ham radio and asked for help in learning CW". Answer: Several for the first part, zero for the second part. Wrong..... Very few for the first part, and alot for the second part. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dan/W4NTI" wrote: It is not relevant because the FCC has stated many times that it will do what the members of the ARS want on certain issues. This is one of them. That isn't a blank check, Dan. The FCC has defined the debate - the goals and purposes of the service. If the Amateur Radio community doesn't reach a consensis within that definition, the FCC clearly isn't going to act on that consensis (and will decide the matter on their own). None of the pro-test arguments I've seen recently fall within that definition. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|