![]() |
|
You're right Advanced was harder, Extra was just a bunch of rules, very little theory. Maybe Riley H. should take a look at the people who ran your Extra Class examination. If it is as you said, then they didn't do it right. Ed WB6SAT |
"Ed G." wrote in message
. .. You're right Advanced was harder, Extra was just a bunch of rules, very little theory. Maybe Riley H. should take a look at the people who ran your Extra Class examination. If it is as you said, then they didn't do it right. Ed WB6SAT Talk to the Friendly Candy Company, they gave it. -- Clif |
"Helmut" wrote in message ... ...... what are you guys going to do, if you hear a station from lets say VK, GB, DL, HB9, and many others, among them rare DX countries? First thing to ask wether or not they did pass the CW Test? and then not continuing the QSO?? Would this be polite? hamlike? How would your reaction be if some DX ham offends you like that? The point is not that wanting qualified operators to have CW or any other radio-related skill is done for any reason of elitism, it is that it USED to take much effort to EARN a license. Now you can get the answers to memorize for a few (far too few) questions and "earn" a license with only a few days of "study". Those of us who took the exams at the FCC offices without any chance of helpful hints, winks or nudges by those giving the exam do not like seeing all our efforts wasted. I had a lot of trouble and spent many, many hours studying to pass the 20 WPM test. I don't even like CW operation very much. But I was glad I spent the time because it really meant something to pass the tests. Now, I realize that it will have been a WASTED EFFORT if this new plan goes through since I would have had extra privileges anyway. 10-4 good buddy, I guess I might as well sell my linears at the nearest truck stop. ---- Brian |
Maybe Riley H. should take a look at the people who ran your Extra Class examination. If it is as you said, then they didn't do right. Talk to the Friendly Candy Company, they gave it. Help me out here, Clif. The FCC hasn't tested in many years, and I can't find any Extra Class holders under your name in the FCC database??? Ed WB6SAT |
The point is not that wanting qualified operators to have CW or any other radio-related skill is done for any reason of elitism, it is that it USED to take much effort to EARN a license. portion snipped But I was glad I spent the time because it really meant something to pass the tests. Now, I realize that it will have been a WASTED EFFORT if this new plan goes through since I would have had extra privileges anyway. Brian, I understand your sentiment as I partly feel the same way, but from what you have said above, it does appear that you place perhaps a bit more value in your accomplishment in getting the license, and maybe a bit too little in just enjoying the hobby? Ed WB6SAT |
Brian and Ed,
it is never wasted time, to learn and study, we are doing this our life long. When brian where studying his 20wpm code, this was a bonehard job, and he got his ticket. Now (maybe since many years) you are still enjoying hamradio and you had many years of fun with it. To call this WASTED EFFORT, you should have been waiting till you get the same ticket codefree. You would have missed a lot of fun throughout the years. Don't mourn about the reached, look out to have fun on the bands. And, to answer some of the concernes about rottening down the holy HF-Band in a CB-manner: Here in Europe, almost all the countries did go the way the WRC agreed on. And there are zumteen thousand of Radio Amateurs, like in VK, now reanimating the bands, a little humble for the beginning, maybe, but I never heard, what you call CB-manners. Maybe this is a problem over there in the US. We are going to help these new HF-Hams to step onto the train. And we welcome them as if they were passing the same test as we did. Greetings from the heart of Europe Helmut OE8SOQ "Ed G." schrieb im Newsbeitrag . .. The point is not that wanting qualified operators to have CW or any other radio-related skill is done for any reason of elitism, it is that it USED to take much effort to EARN a license. portion snipped But I was glad I spent the time because it really meant something to pass the tests. Now, I realize that it will have been a WASTED EFFORT if this new plan goes through since I would have had extra privileges anyway. Brian, I understand your sentiment as I partly feel the same way, but from what you have said above, it does appear that you place perhaps a bit more value in your accomplishment in getting the license, and maybe a bit too little in just enjoying the hobby? Ed WB6SAT |
http://www.nocode.org/
"Ed G." wrote in message . .. It's all part of the "dumbing down of America" that has been going on for the last 20-30 years. Seems to me it started back farther than that.... probably in the late 60's when the "new math" was being pushed by pointy headed liberal educators. Ed WB6SAT |
"Ed G." wrote in message
. .. Maybe Riley H. should take a look at the people who ran your Extra Class examination. If it is as you said, then they didn't do right. Talk to the Friendly Candy Company, they gave it. Help me out here, Clif. The FCC hasn't tested in many years, and I can't find any Extra Class holders under your name in the FCC database??? Ed WB6SAT You're right, I never passed the code. Something about tinny headphones and a noisy room. Except for Novice all my tests were given by the FCC in their office downtown. -- Clif Holland, KA5IPF |
Bob:
Please keep in mind that, in general, the ham HF frequencies are much friendly (and saner) than the newsgroups. I've only been licensed a little over two years (I didn't "stop off" at Tech). When studying for 4 exams, I posted a some questions to several of the ham newsgroups -- mostly seeking advice on how to learn Code. There were quite a few rants and raves. I was accused of trolling; I was told that since I would pass easy tests, I would never be a REAL ham; I was told to go back to the chicken band (despite the fact that I have never been on CB); etc. etc. I became very scared. If hams were this nasty, did I really want to invest the time and money in this new hobby? Luckily a few kind souls were supportive and friendly -- enough so that I went ahead and passed all the elements the first time (which does prove they are too easy grin). Once I got on the air almost everyone was kind, supportive, friendly, helpful (add your own positive adjectives here). So, Bob, ignore the rants here. I'm sure you will find that the vast majority will welcome you to HF. Well, perhaps not on 75 meters. grin Paul AB0SI "Bob" wrote in message ... Amen Bill, There is one point that has not been addressed. There will be a group of new hams on the HF bands, myself included, how are you going to welcome them? Are you going to help them become good legal operators or are you going to label them CB plussers, and ignore, tout them? Think about it. Here will be a pool of individuals who have expressed a intrest in the hobby, treat them well and instruct them, you have to have new blood to carry the tourch. They might even see the advantages of CW and learn it! I learned it in the Navy, but only use it when necessary for effective communications. Bob KE4ZRU Ex. Airborne Communications Officer Ex. Staff Communications Officer |
"Brian Bailey" wrote in message ... "Helmut" wrote in message ... ..... what are you guys going to do, if you hear a station from lets say VK, GB, DL, HB9, and many others, among them rare DX countries? First thing to ask wether or not they did pass the CW Test? and then not continuing the QSO?? Would this be polite? hamlike? How would your reaction be if some DX ham offends you like that? The point is not that wanting qualified operators to have CW or any other radio-related skill is done for any reason of elitism, it is that it USED to take much effort to EARN a license. Now you can get the answers to memorize for a few (far too few) questions and "earn" a license with only a few days of "study". Those of us who took the exams at the FCC offices without any chance of helpful hints, winks or nudges by those giving the exam do not like seeing all our efforts wasted. I had a lot of trouble and spent many, many hours studying to pass the 20 WPM test. I don't even like CW operation very much. But I was glad I spent the time because it really meant something to pass the tests. Now, I realize that it will have been a WASTED EFFORT if this new plan goes through since I would have had extra privileges anyway. 10-4 good buddy, I guess I might as well sell my linears at the nearest truck stop. ---- Brian No Brian it is not a wasted effort on your part. You did it the right way. You didn't whine and bitch and moan until the testing was dumbed down to the lowest denominator. Unfortunatly this country is showing the rest of the world how NOT to do things. If this sort of attitude persists we will cease to be a power on this planet. And I don't mean military power. I too had considered tossing it all away. But I won't. I am too dedicated to the service to do that. I will 'attempt' to show and if needed, to correct those that want to drag the service downward to the level of CB. I think this may actually help us CW types out. I expect a lot of folks will be dragging out the keys to re-enter what they know was ham radio. Dan/W4NTI |
"Ed G." wrote in message . .. The point is not that wanting qualified operators to have CW or any other radio-related skill is done for any reason of elitism, it is that it USED to take much effort to EARN a license. portion snipped But I was glad I spent the time because it really meant something to pass the tests. Now, I realize that it will have been a WASTED EFFORT if this new plan goes through since I would have had extra privileges anyway. Brian, I understand your sentiment as I partly feel the same way, but from what you have said above, it does appear that you place perhaps a bit more value in your accomplishment in getting the license, and maybe a bit too little in just enjoying the hobby? Ed WB6SAT Thats not fair at all Ed. Brian is correct in what he says. We DID have to work much harder. And it just is not right. Period. Dan/W4NTI |
"Bill Turner" wrote in message ... On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 15:15:21 +0000, Bob wrote: There will be a group of new hams on the HF bands, myself included, how are you going to welcome them? Are you going to help them become good legal operators or are you going to label them CB plussers, and ignore, tout them? __________________________________________________ _______ Bob, your question is a good one, but there is a more subtle question hidden within it. Why do we even have a license structure which causes such divisiveness between hams? I hate this beating of breasts and bragging about how smart and clever I am to have an Extra class license and how dumb you are since you don't. The Old Timers will remember back in the days before incentive licensing when there were essentially two licenses: Novice and General. The Novice was just to get your feet wet and was non-renewable. You either upped to General or gave up the hobby. The divisiveness we see today didn't exist. I miss those days. -- 73, Bill W6WRT p.s. Purists will note there were other classes back then (Technician, Conditional, Advanced) but the numbers were very small relative to Novice and General. Boy you hit that right on the head. Incentive licensing is the single biggest reason we have all this bitching and moaning today. I've said this ever since 1968 when most of my (then) General class privledges were ripped from me. Now we have the league with its 180 degree reversal on the subject. Can anyone say hypocrite ? Dan/W4NTI |
snip"Unfortunatly this country is showing the rest of the world how NOT to
do" NOT true! The majority of the world has already eliminated the code! things. "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message ink.net... "Brian Bailey" wrote in message ... "Helmut" wrote in message ... ..... what are you guys going to do, if you hear a station from lets say VK, GB, DL, HB9, and many others, among them rare DX countries? First thing to ask wether or not they did pass the CW Test? and then not continuing the QSO?? Would this be polite? hamlike? How would your reaction be if some DX ham offends you like that? The point is not that wanting qualified operators to have CW or any other radio-related skill is done for any reason of elitism, it is that it USED to take much effort to EARN a license. Now you can get the answers to memorize for a few (far too few) questions and "earn" a license with only a few days of "study". Those of us who took the exams at the FCC offices without any chance of helpful hints, winks or nudges by those giving the exam do not like seeing all our efforts wasted. I had a lot of trouble and spent many, many hours studying to pass the 20 WPM test. I don't even like CW operation very much. But I was glad I spent the time because it really meant something to pass the tests. Now, I realize that it will have been a WASTED EFFORT if this new plan goes through since I would have had extra privileges anyway. 10-4 good buddy, I guess I might as well sell my linears at the nearest truck stop. ---- Brian No Brian it is not a wasted effort on your part. You did it the right way. You didn't whine and bitch and moan until the testing was dumbed down to the lowest denominator. Unfortunatly this country is showing the rest of the world how NOT to do things. If this sort of attitude persists we will cease to be a power on this planet. And I don't mean military power. I too had considered tossing it all away. But I won't. I am too dedicated to the service to do that. I will 'attempt' to show and if needed, to correct those that want to drag the service downward to the level of CB. I think this may actually help us CW types out. I expect a lot of folks will be dragging out the keys to re-enter what they know was ham radio. Dan/W4NTI |
Bill Turner wrote: On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 07:27:25 +0100, "Helmut" wrote: it is never wasted time, to learn and study __________________________________________________ _______ Nonsense. Many "studies" in life are a waste of time. A fool will "study" anything. A wise man puts his efforts where they will do the most good. The trick is to know the difference. Your hours on this earth are limited. Don't waste them. -- Bill, W6WRT Hi, So you want to build your castle on a sand dune? Study is continuation in all your life. You just can't pick and choose. The more you study, the better you become over all. At least that is my idea. I am going back to univeristy to compete with my kids side by side. Well, Sr. citizens are exempt from tuition as well. So why not? I guess you're really WISE MAN for sure. I am not. 73, Tony, VE6CGX (retired EE, class of '60) |
CW proficiency on hf will be a moot point when powerline broadband fires up.
jim |
"Bill Turner" wrote in message ... On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 22:06:09 -0500, "Ray D. Ator" wrote: No commercial interest wants space on HF- VHF and up- different story! __________________________________________________ _______ So let's trade our VHF bands for some nice, clean, EXCLUSIVE HF bands, what say? :-) -- Bill, W6WRT That is what is happening right now. FCC making it so easy to get on HF and vacating VHF. That way the govt can claim no activity on VHF/UHF and auction it off for big bucks. Then with all the new 'hams' on HF the bands will be so crowded that we will have 'frequency fights' all over the hf spectrum. Thus giving the gobermint a reason to sanction and eventually elliminate ham radio. Don't believe me? Just watch. Dan/W4NTI |
The ARRL is a publishing company, the only way to maintain their existence
is for there to be MANY MORE hams to BUY many books from them. I can remember a time when the ARRL actually represented the interests of ham radio, but they now have the corporate mentality. "What is that beeping noise on my radio? Oh well, I'll just talk over it." "Mark Russo" wrote in message ... One of these below will get you there... Seems to me that they should bump up the current General class to Advanced class. This way people who worked hard to get to General will not be locked in with the no code folks. That seems fair?. http://www.remote.arrl.org/news/stor.../01/19/1/?nc=1 Click he ARRLWeb: ARRL to Propose New Entry-Level License, Code-Free HF Access |
A license was required in the beginning that is true, however, the FCC
lost all control of the users so the feds took the easy way out. They just did away with that little law and declared all users legal. Kinda the way that amateur radio is going right now. Five bucks and my now non-existing Advanced class ticket says that a no code, no written test will be operating HF anywhere, any mode, yea verily! HT3 wrote: Isn't this the same thing that happened to the CB culture in the mid to late 70's? Back then you had to license, but all of a sudden that was too inconvenient. So licensing was eliminated and every hemorrhoid could get a radio and ruin the band. Mark Russo wrote: One of these below will get you there... Seems to me that they should bump up the current General class to Advanced class. This way people who worked hard to get to General will not be locked in with the no code folks. That seems fair?. http://www.remote.arrl.org/news/stor.../01/19/1/?nc=1 Click he ARRLWeb: ARRL to Propose New Entry-Level License, Code-Free HF Access |
Just follow the laws your losers.
You whine too much. You ruin the hobby. If you dont like ham radio,LEAVE. "Butch" wrote in message ... A license was required in the beginning that is true, however, the FCC lost all control of the users so the feds took the easy way out. They just did away with that little law and declared all users legal. Kinda the way that amateur radio is going right now. Five bucks and my now non-existing Advanced class ticket says that a no code, no written test will be operating HF anywhere, any mode, yea verily! HT3 wrote: Isn't this the same thing that happened to the CB culture in the mid to late 70's? Back then you had to license, but all of a sudden that was too inconvenient. So licensing was eliminated and every hemorrhoid could get a radio and ruin the band. Mark Russo wrote: One of these below will get you there... Seems to me that they should bump up the current General class to Advanced class. This way people who worked hard to get to General will not be locked in with the no code folks. That seems fair?. http://www.remote.arrl.org/news/stor.../01/19/1/?nc=1 Click he ARRLWeb: ARRL to Propose New Entry-Level License, Code-Free HF Access |
how about the know General class get made General+
like thay did the tech's butt let tham do every thing thay are know no low rf power kb9yku On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 04:43:08 GMT, Mark Russo wrote: One of these below will get you there... Seems to me that they should bump up the current General class to Advanced class. This way people who worked hard to get to General will not be locked in with the no code folks. That seems fair?. http://www.remote.arrl.org/news/stor.../01/19/1/?nc=1 Click he ARRLWeb: ARRL to Propose New Entry-Level License, Code-Free HF Access |
If you bumped the Generals up to Advanced, you would start a war
because the Advanced users had to take a harder written test. Remember, they had to work harder for it! Would everyone be happy if there was just one license class for voice and have a code endorsement if they passed the code? The last post kind of sounds more effective than any I have heard in years since all this restructuring stuff started. Keep all class licenses and just add a + to there license for CW. Also allow the ones who want to talk voice do so on HF. By the way, How many CB'rs do you know that can actually afford and expensive Kenwood rig capable of going down that far anyways? On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 10:48:17 -0500, safemale wrote: how about the know General class get made General+ like thay did the tech's butt let tham do every thing thay are know no low rf power kb9yku On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 04:43:08 GMT, Mark Russo wrote: One of these below will get you there... Seems to me that they should bump up the current General class to Advanced class. This way people who worked hard to get to General will not be locked in with the no code folks. That seems fair?. http://www.remote.arrl.org/news/stor.../01/19/1/?nc=1 Click he ARRLWeb: ARRL to Propose New Entry-Level License, Code-Free HF Access |
Here is the best solution.
Return everyone back to NOVICE, CW only on 80, 40, 15 meters. Allow ONLY EXTRA CLASS present holders that have passed the 20 WPM test to operate the rest of HF. Dan/W4NTI "safemale" wrote in message ... how about the know General class get made General+ like thay did the tech's butt let tham do every thing thay are know no low rf power kb9yku On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 04:43:08 GMT, Mark Russo wrote: One of these below will get you there... Seems to me that they should bump up the current General class to Advanced class. This way people who worked hard to get to General will not be locked in with the no code folks. That seems fair?. http://www.remote.arrl.org/news/stor.../01/19/1/?nc=1 Click he ARRLWeb: ARRL to Propose New Entry-Level License, Code-Free HF Access |
And there you have it! :)
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 17:57:11 GMT, "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote: Here is the best solution. Return everyone back to NOVICE, CW only on 80, 40, 15 meters. Allow ONLY EXTRA CLASS present holders that have passed the 20 WPM test to operate the rest of HF. Dan/W4NTI "safemale" wrote in message .. . how about the know General class get made General+ like thay did the tech's butt let tham do every thing thay are know no low rf power kb9yku On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 04:43:08 GMT, Mark Russo wrote: One of these below will get you there... Seems to me that they should bump up the current General class to Advanced class. This way people who worked hard to get to General will not be locked in with the no code folks. That seems fair?. http://www.remote.arrl.org/news/stor.../01/19/1/?nc=1 Click he ARRLWeb: ARRL to Propose New Entry-Level License, Code-Free HF Access |
Dannie Boy, the supposed "CW GOD" ranted:
Return everyone back to NOVICE, CW only on 80, 40, 15 meters. Allow ONLY EXTRA CLASS present holders that have passed the 20 WPM test to operate the rest of HF. And re-test Extras every 2 years...2 years w/o privileges if they don't pass a 250 question test and 20WPM...and drop 'em to Novice if they're caught cussing on the band...or pull their ticket. THAT will open up some of the bands! Humph..think I'll stay on 6M CW/SSB....seems like a better class of folks up there. Besides, if Dannie Boy's solution went into effect, we'd HAVE no Amateur Service. This is EXACTLY what some in the FCC would like to accomplish.....they could then sell off the rest of the freq. spectrum. Big $$ in their pockets! A |
GREAT idea Dan! SparksDan/W4NTI wrote:
Here is the best solution. Return everyone back to NOVICE, CW only on 80, 40, 15 meters. Allow ONLY EXTRA CLASS present holders that have passed the 20 WPM test to operate the rest of HF. Dan/W4NTI "safemale" wrote in message ... how about the know General class get made General+ like thay did the tech's butt let tham do every thing thay are know no low rf power kb9yku On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 04:43:08 GMT, Mark Russo wrote: One of these below will get you there... Seems to me that they should bump up the current General class to Advanced class. This way people who worked hard to get to General will not be locked in with the no code folks. That seems fair?. http://www.remote.arrl.org/news/stor.../01/19/1/?nc=1 Click he ARRLWeb: ARRL to Propose New Entry-Level License, Code-Free HF Access |
Maybe for you. It's not the best solution for all hams.
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message k.net... Here is the best solution. Return everyone back to NOVICE, CW only on 80, 40, 15 meters. Allow ONLY EXTRA CLASS present holders that have passed the 20 WPM test to operate the rest of HF. Dan/W4NTI "safemale" wrote in message ... how about the know General class get made General+ like thay did the tech's butt let tham do every thing thay are know no low rf power kb9yku On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 04:43:08 GMT, Mark Russo wrote: One of these below will get you there... Seems to me that they should bump up the current General class to Advanced class. This way people who worked hard to get to General will not be locked in with the no code folks. That seems fair?. http://www.remote.arrl.org/news/stor.../01/19/1/?nc=1 Click he ARRLWeb: ARRL to Propose New Entry-Level License, Code-Free HF Access |
Sure it is, you just don't know it yet.
Dan/W4NTI "K2NNJ" wrote in message et... Maybe for you. It's not the best solution for all hams. "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message k.net... Here is the best solution. Return everyone back to NOVICE, CW only on 80, 40, 15 meters. Allow ONLY EXTRA CLASS present holders that have passed the 20 WPM test to operate the rest of HF. Dan/W4NTI "safemale" wrote in message ... how about the know General class get made General+ like thay did the tech's butt let tham do every thing thay are know no low rf power kb9yku On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 04:43:08 GMT, Mark Russo wrote: One of these below will get you there... Seems to me that they should bump up the current General class to Advanced class. This way people who worked hard to get to General will not be locked in with the no code folks. That seems fair?. http://www.remote.arrl.org/news/stor.../01/19/1/?nc=1 Click he ARRLWeb: ARRL to Propose New Entry-Level License, Code-Free HF Access |
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 17:57:11 GMT, "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this
mindspring.com wrote: Here is the best solution. Return everyone back to NOVICE, CW only on 80, 40, 15 meters. 75 Watts, Xtal control only, of course, like the good old days! W4OLF |
"Brian Bailey" wrote in message ... On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 17:57:11 GMT, "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote: Here is the best solution. Return everyone back to NOVICE, CW only on 80, 40, 15 meters. 75 Watts, Xtal control only, of course, like the good old days! W4OLF Exactly and your the only one to notice. Dan/W4NTI |
Where is Wayne Green, W2NSD when you need Him.. The A.R.R.L SUCKS.. Just my opinion.. Bob |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:55 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com