Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill Turner" wrote in message ... On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 15:15:21 +0000, Bob wrote: There will be a group of new hams on the HF bands, myself included, how are you going to welcome them? Are you going to help them become good legal operators or are you going to label them CB plussers, and ignore, tout them? __________________________________________________ _______ Bob, your question is a good one, but there is a more subtle question hidden within it. Why do we even have a license structure which causes such divisiveness between hams? I hate this beating of breasts and bragging about how smart and clever I am to have an Extra class license and how dumb you are since you don't. The Old Timers will remember back in the days before incentive licensing when there were essentially two licenses: Novice and General. The Novice was just to get your feet wet and was non-renewable. You either upped to General or gave up the hobby. The divisiveness we see today didn't exist. I miss those days. -- 73, Bill W6WRT p.s. Purists will note there were other classes back then (Technician, Conditional, Advanced) but the numbers were very small relative to Novice and General. Boy you hit that right on the head. Incentive licensing is the single biggest reason we have all this bitching and moaning today. I've said this ever since 1968 when most of my (then) General class privledges were ripped from me. Now we have the league with its 180 degree reversal on the subject. Can anyone say hypocrite ? Dan/W4NTI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
GRAYLAND 2004 FALL DXPEDITION: Compiled Logs for Oct 15-17 (Part 1) | Shortwave | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL and the local scene | Policy | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy | |||
Low reenlistment rate | Policy |