Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Zoran Brlecic wrote:
Bob wrote: In general, electrolytic capacitors should be operated not terribly much below their ratings. I am curious: where did you hear this and what is the rationale? I've never heard anything similar before, although I suppose it is possible. I tripped across the concept many years ago. Seems that electrolytic caps are not created equal, said devices being dependent upon the plate area and the reciprocal of the oxide layer thickness on the aluminum electrode to supply the proper capacitance and on the oxide layer thickness for the DC Working Volts rating. This oxide layer depends upon the polarizing voltage for its maintenance, and the electrolytic electrode is formulated to maintain the proper oxide thickness at the capacitor's normal voltage. Insufficient voltage results in a thinner than expected oxide layer, resulting in increased capacitance (not normally a Bad Thing) and decreased breakdown voltage (which is a Bad Thing). I don't know if it is possible for a derated cap to lose enough oxide to drop its breakdown voltage below its normal working voltage, but it would result in a dramatic failure if it ever did happen. YMMV, IIRC, IANAL, and any other disclaimers one wishes to insert. Perhaps there's a component engineer reading this group who could speak to what I remember, or believe I remember, on this matter. de kg7yy |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Electrolytic coupling capacitors | Homebrew | |||
Electrolytic coupling capacitors | Homebrew | |||
Electrolytic caps question | Equipment | |||
Electrolytic caps question | Boatanchors | |||
Electrolytic caps question | Homebrew |