http://www.hamwave.com/cgi-bin/index...iewnews&id=382

So much for the idea that congresspersons, even if they're hams, have
any intelligence. The ARRL proposal is a disaster waiting to happen.

With all kind wishes,

de Hans, K0HB
ARRL Vice Director (Retired)

In article ,
"Hamguy" wrote:

http://www.hamwave.com/cgi-bin/index...iewnews&id=382


As our numbers continue to dwindle regardless of this proposal, in fact
this may make the numbers go down faster, I give ham radio 10 maybe 15
years and it'll be gone except for a tiny BPL/Part 15 device shared hf
band of frequencies sort of like 17 meters only it will be channelized
like 60 meters. There won't be any need for more, only less. The
commercal interests will gobble it up and the spectrum will be filled
with digital garbage from gadgets yet to be invented.

Dale, K9VUJ

--
Email:

Your right good thing someone still remember what HAM radio all about.
73 Bill WA0KBZ

"KØHB" wrote in message
ink.net...


So much for the idea that congresspersons, even if they're hams, have
any intelligence. The ARRL proposal is a disaster waiting to happen.

With all kind wishes,

de Hans, K0HB
ARRL Vice Director (Retired)

"Bill Turner" wrote

Grammar?

Point?

I remember incentive licensing from 1968 and was effected by it. It was a
proposal of the ARRL also and the FCC took it hook line and sinker.......This
new proposal is not in the same context of that in 1968, so which one is the
"big goof"? Duh?