![]() |
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
|
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:54:10 -0400, wrote:
not in my opinion which for the pruposes of posting is all that counts No, actually, "for the purposes of posting", your opinion doesn't count at all to most people. But, since you have such a limited view of the world, you won't understand what that means. |
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:55:07 -0400, wrote:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 00:12:21 -0400, Al Klein wrote: Sorry, I don't share your religious incredulity. I don't recognize "sin" as anything but a nonsense word. you certainly a polite ham ....NOT Is that religious bigotry I'm hearing, Mark? "Accept my beliefs as fact or be labeled impolite"? |
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
|
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
From: Al Klein on Sun, Aug 13 2006 9:15 pm
Groups: rec.radio.amateur.antenna, rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.scanner, rec.radio.swap On 12 Aug 2006 18:58:18 -0700, "an old friend" wrote: wrote: How did capacitors escape getting color coded? ssshhhhh bb don't ask such questions please Since a) you don't know the answer and b) they didn't. Klein, you said you were an OF. Any olde-fahrt ought to KNOW that silver-mica capacitors were color-dot-coded for about a quarter century. [look in the 1976 ARRL Handbook] Those flat cases were eventually displaced by dipped silver-mica. Paper tubular capacitors in molded plastic tubular casings were marked with color bands and were on the market for at least 15 years, maybe 20...until aced out by ceramic disc capacitors for general bypassing and coupling applications (by both tube and transistor architecture electronics). ANYONE with hands-on experience in electronics between 1950 and about 1970 would KNOW that. [okay, folks, looks like there's another imposter here...at least this one isn't trying to pass hisself off as some marine NCO...:-) |
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:22:26 -0400, wrote:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:09:43 -0400, Al Klein wrote: On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:34:58 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 23:54:12 -0400, Al Klein wrote: On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 19:13:23 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 18:24:46 -0400, Al Klein wrote: Your claim to know what I'm thinking better than I do? Only if your age is a single digit. sure I know better Then you're claiming to be a child. nope you are claiming to something contary to fact I'm claiming that I know what I think and you don't - which is a fact. prove it Are you telepathic? No? Then you can't know what I think. I don't think you truely understand what you think, that is another fact That you don't think I do is a fact. That I don't understand isn't. So what you think is incorrect and that's another fact. you are worng it becoming hazing when the subject of the test is unrelated to the prevlegdes it grannts Nope - it's just a poor test. Hazing is something entirely different. hazing is in the ye of the beholder No, words have actual meanings sometimes. do you have anything cogent to say? Cogent in your eyes, no, since you and cogency have never met. |
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
From: jawod on Sun, Aug 13 2006 8:16 am
an old friend wrote: Al Klein wrote: On 12 Aug 2006 10:10:55 -0700, "an old friend" wrote: Anyway,, Back in the old days, we used to walk 5 miles in the snow to the FCC field office to take our exams. You forgot: "uphill both ways, barefoot..." We had to kneel on radiators while we took the test. We used slide rules and crayons AND WE LIKED IT!!! You are still using crayons but I doubt you know how to use a 1950 slide-rule...too complex for brass-pounders. Oh, and FCC Field Offices were NOT 10 miles apart in the USA now, in 1956 (when I took a train 80 miles into Chicago), nor before then. Then we'd wait 3 years to receive our license which gave us time to teach electrons to enter and exit all the tubes...stupid little buggers, those. Wrongo, olde-fahrt. Electrons, fields, and waves will ONLY obey THEIR rules. You can't "teach" them anything. All you can do is provide paths for them...on THEIR terms. Boy, those were the days. When a ham was a ham, brass was for pounding and AM signals were as wide as the day is long. That was well before 1960...like before WW2. These "young" whippersnappers get off too easy. Pizza off, olde-fahrt. 51 years ago I would be walking a mile from a corner of an airfield NE of Tokyo to the transmitter house in the center which housed 41 HF transmitters ranging in power output from 1 KW to 40 KW. Not a single one of them used manual (morse code) radiotelegraphy modes. About two square miles of wire antennas doing 24/7 radio circuit transmission to CONUS, Hawaii, Phillippines, Okinawa, Korea, and a MAG in Vietnam. Six of those circuits used multichannel SSB (the commercial variety, like in-use prior to WW2). I STARTED that HF transmitter site work in '53, NO military schooling on kilowatt transmitters, RTTY, or SSB and NO "CW" skill necessary. I say, rank priveleges on the basis of how big an RF burn you can take, or on the basis of personal weight. Sounds like you had TOO MANY of those "RF burns." See Dr. Robeson in here...he will bandage your "burns" with one of his medical-practice certificates...those are sterile. I may have said it befo take the FCC out of it completely and go with the FDA. Those boys know how to grade. "Ham is the butchered meat of swine?" Last guy I heard utter that phrase is SK...used to work with him (he was a code-tested Extra)...he came out with that every once in a while when some amateur morseman got too full of himself. (Too much tea this morning!) Try a detox program, okay? QRT. |
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:24:36 -0400, wrote:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:12:03 -0400, Al Klein wrote: On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:36:29 -0400, wrote: you can't explain it to me or to a frormer (or current memeber of Mensa Being a member of MENSA doesn't mean anything more than potential. It certainly doesn't mean realized potential. nor it seems can you explain where it counts...The FCC I have to explain something to the FCC? Look up the definition of "libel". Part of it is "malicious defamation". Calling a penny a cent isn't malicious, nor is it defamatory. but calling someone a cheat on federal requirement is Post a link to my post calling you "a cheat on federal requirement" - or even just calling you a cheat. why? you would simply dey it I'd deny a link? Would you deny a sunrise? Are you *really* as daft as you sound here? but you compare those that took and passed the test required at the time to theifs that sure soound calling em cheats to me But since I never compared anyone to anything, it's all in your mind. |
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
From: jawod on Sun, Aug 13 2006 3:24 pm
Groups: rec.radio.amateur.antenna, rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.scanner, rec.radio.swap If MENSA membership is important to you, fine. Most of us find it a bit pretentious and downright silly. If someone wants to use MENSA to elevate themselves above the rest, they are perched on very rickety stilts. If MORSEMANSHIP is important to you, fine. Most of US find it a bit pretentious and downright silly. If someone wants to use MORSEMANSHIP to elevate themselves above the rest, they are perched on very rickety stilts. [I'll just add something like...]: Stilts are needed by morsemen because their appearance, relative to REAL radio people, are very short. They try to gain "height" of their reputation by using 1930s standards in the year 2006. Tsk, they don't realize that their new "height" still falls short of everyone else... |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:03 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com