RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Swap (https://www.radiobanter.com/swap/)
-   -   If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die? (https://www.radiobanter.com/swap/98643-if-you-had-use-cw-save-someones-life-would-person-die.html)

Al Klein August 14th 06 09:27 PM

If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
 
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:51:06 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 23:51:10 -0400, Al Klein
wrote:


There's nothing either malicious not defamatory in that. ("Who" am I
defaming? "Hair"?)


myself for example by comparing me to a theft


1) A theft is an act - I wasn't comparing anyone to an act.

2) Quote where I'm comparing you to anything.

Telling you something true about yourself isn't actionable, unless
done with certain intent, which you'd be hard-pressed to prove.


never said it was actiionable


You keep using the word "libel" - that means actionable, since libel
is a civil tort.

do you understand english it seem not


Oh, I understand it. It's difficult to get published if you don't
understand the language in which you're writing. Your posts, however,
demonstrate a clear lack of ability to use the language to communicate
clearly.

however when you keep compating someone to theifs in time I suspect it
would rise to being actionale


If I ever did, which I never have.

what protects you is that judgement is not particularly collectable
and therefore not worth an atorneys time


How would you know whether a judgment against me is collectable?

Or is this another case of what you say having nothing to do with what
you mean?

Al Klein August 14th 06 09:30 PM

If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
 
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:54:10 -0400, wrote:

not in my opinion which for the pruposes of posting is all that counts


No, actually, "for the purposes of posting", your opinion doesn't
count at all to most people. But, since you have such a limited view
of the world, you won't understand what that means.

Al Klein August 14th 06 09:31 PM

If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
 
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:55:07 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 00:12:21 -0400, Al Klein
wrote:


Sorry, I don't share your religious incredulity. I don't recognize
"sin" as anything but a nonsense word.


you certainly a polite ham ....NOT


Is that religious bigotry I'm hearing, Mark? "Accept my beliefs as
fact or be labeled impolite"?

Al Klein August 15th 06 02:40 AM

If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
 
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:20:01 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:06:32 -0400, Al Klein
wrote:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:32:06 -0400,
wrote:

but your point?


That if you bought 5 clues you'd still be less than clueless.


but still your point is what?


Want to go for another ride on the merry-go-round?

Al Klein August 15th 06 02:41 AM

If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
 
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:20:50 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:07:30 -0400, Al Klein
wrote:

On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:32:41 -0400,
wrote:

On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 00:15:18 -0400, Al Klein
wrote:

On 12 Aug 2006 18:58:18 -0700, "an old friend"
wrote:

wrote:

How did capacitors escape getting color coded?

ssshhhhh bb don't ask such questions please

Since a) you don't know the answer and b) they didn't.


no I did ot know that answer and you lied they did


I *HAVE* capacitors that are color coded, so you lied about my lying.

then you lied when you typed " they didn't." or used english
incoreectly or


Or typed something that was beyond your comprehension - a double
negative.

[email protected] August 15th 06 02:42 AM

If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
 
From: Al Klein on Sun, Aug 13 2006 9:15 pm
Groups: rec.radio.amateur.antenna, rec.radio.amateur.policy,
rec.radio.scanner, rec.radio.swap


On 12 Aug 2006 18:58:18 -0700, "an old friend" wrote:
wrote:
How did capacitors escape getting color coded?

ssshhhhh bb don't ask such questions please


Since a) you don't know the answer and b) they didn't.


Klein, you said you were an OF. Any olde-fahrt ought to KNOW that
silver-mica capacitors were color-dot-coded for about a quarter
century. [look in the 1976 ARRL Handbook] Those flat cases
were eventually displaced by dipped silver-mica.

Paper tubular capacitors in molded plastic tubular casings were
marked with color bands and were on the market for at least
15 years, maybe 20...until aced out by ceramic disc capacitors
for general bypassing and coupling applications (by both tube
and transistor architecture electronics).

ANYONE with hands-on experience in electronics between 1950
and about 1970 would KNOW that. [okay, folks, looks like
there's another imposter here...at least this one isn't
trying to pass hisself off as some marine NCO...:-)




Al Klein August 15th 06 02:43 AM

If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
 
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:22:26 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:09:43 -0400, Al Klein
wrote:

On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:34:58 -0400,
wrote:

On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 23:54:12 -0400, Al Klein
wrote:

On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 19:13:23 -0400,
wrote:

On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 18:24:46 -0400, Al Klein
wrote:

Your claim to know what I'm thinking better than I do? Only if your
age is a single digit.

sure I know better

Then you're claiming to be a child.


nope you are claiming to something contary to fact


I'm claiming that I know what I think and you don't - which is a fact.


prove it


Are you telepathic? No? Then you can't know what I think.

I don't think you truely understand what you think, that is another
fact


That you don't think I do is a fact. That I don't understand isn't.
So what you think is incorrect and that's another fact.

you are worng it becoming hazing when the subject of the test is
unrelated to the prevlegdes it grannts


Nope - it's just a poor test. Hazing is something entirely different.


hazing is in the ye of the beholder


No, words have actual meanings sometimes.

do you have anything cogent to say?


Cogent in your eyes, no, since you and cogency have never met.

[email protected] August 15th 06 02:45 AM

If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
 
From: jawod on Sun, Aug 13 2006 8:16 am


an old friend wrote:
Al Klein wrote:
On 12 Aug 2006 10:10:55 -0700, "an old friend" wrote:



Anyway,,
Back in the old days, we used to walk 5 miles in the snow to the FCC
field office to take our exams.


You forgot: "uphill both ways, barefoot..."

We had to kneel on radiators while we
took the test. We used slide rules and crayons AND WE LIKED IT!!!


You are still using crayons but I doubt you know how to
use a 1950 slide-rule...too complex for brass-pounders.

Oh, and FCC Field Offices were NOT 10 miles apart in the USA
now, in 1956 (when I took a train 80 miles into Chicago), nor
before then.

Then we'd wait 3 years to receive our license which gave us time to
teach electrons to enter and exit all the tubes...stupid little buggers,
those.


Wrongo, olde-fahrt. Electrons, fields, and waves will ONLY
obey THEIR rules. You can't "teach" them anything. All you
can do is provide paths for them...on THEIR terms.

Boy, those were the days. When a ham was a ham, brass was for pounding
and AM signals were as wide as the day is long.


That was well before 1960...like before WW2.

These "young" whippersnappers get off too easy.


Pizza off, olde-fahrt. 51 years ago I would be walking a mile
from a corner of an airfield NE of Tokyo to the transmitter
house in the center which housed 41 HF transmitters ranging
in power output from 1 KW to 40 KW. Not a single one of
them used manual (morse code) radiotelegraphy modes. About
two square miles of wire antennas doing 24/7 radio circuit
transmission to CONUS, Hawaii, Phillippines, Okinawa, Korea,
and a MAG in Vietnam. Six of those circuits used multichannel
SSB (the commercial variety, like in-use prior to WW2).

I STARTED that HF transmitter site work in '53, NO military
schooling on kilowatt transmitters, RTTY, or SSB and NO
"CW" skill necessary.

I say, rank priveleges on the basis of how big an RF burn you can take,
or on the basis of personal weight.


Sounds like you had TOO MANY of those "RF burns."

See Dr. Robeson in here...he will bandage your "burns" with
one of his medical-practice certificates...those are sterile.


I may have said it befo take the FCC out of it completely and go with
the FDA. Those boys know how to grade.


"Ham is the butchered meat of swine?"

Last guy I heard utter that phrase is SK...used to work with him
(he was a code-tested Extra)...he came out with that every once
in a while when some amateur morseman got too full of himself.

(Too much tea this morning!)


Try a detox program, okay? QRT.




Al Klein August 15th 06 02:47 AM

If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
 
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:24:36 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:12:03 -0400, Al Klein
wrote:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:36:29 -0400,
wrote:

you can't explain it to me or to a frormer (or current memeber of
Mensa


Being a member of MENSA doesn't mean anything more than potential. It
certainly doesn't mean realized potential.

nor it seems can you explain where it counts...The FCC


I have to explain something to the FCC?

Look up the definition of "libel". Part of it is "malicious
defamation". Calling a penny a cent isn't malicious, nor is it
defamatory.


but calling someone a cheat on federal requirement is


Post a link to my post calling you "a cheat on federal requirement" -
or even just calling you a cheat.


why? you would simply dey it


I'd deny a link? Would you deny a sunrise? Are you *really* as daft
as you sound here?

but you compare those that took and passed the test required at the
time to theifs that sure soound calling em cheats to me


But since I never compared anyone to anything, it's all in your mind.

[email protected] August 15th 06 02:48 AM

If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
 
From: jawod on Sun, Aug 13 2006 3:24 pm
Groups: rec.radio.amateur.antenna, rec.radio.amateur.policy,
rec.radio.scanner, rec.radio.swap


If MENSA membership is important to you, fine. Most of us find it a bit
pretentious and downright silly.

If someone wants to use MENSA to elevate themselves above the rest, they
are perched on very rickety stilts.


If MORSEMANSHIP is important to you, fine. Most of US find it a bit
pretentious and downright silly.

If someone wants to use MORSEMANSHIP to elevate themselves above
the rest, they are perched on very rickety stilts.

[I'll just add something like...]:

Stilts are needed by morsemen because their appearance, relative
to REAL radio people, are very short. They try to gain "height"
of their reputation by using 1930s standards in the year 2006.
Tsk, they don't realize that their new "height" still falls
short of everyone else...





All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com