View Single Post
  #224   Report Post  
Old October 21st 03, 06:12 PM
Dwight Stewart
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"N2EY" wrote:
"Dwight Stewart" writes:
"Dick Carroll" wrote:

I still find it beyond incredible that persons who would
learn all that goes into making an engineer would have
any problem whatever with learning the most basic radio
communications skill at the most minimal level.


Because, as far as the "engineer" is concerned, it (code)
isn't a "basic radio communications skill" today, Dick.


Perhaps - but we're amateurs, remember? Not professionals.



Yes, I do remember, Jim. However, why are you asking me this question?
Dick is the one who brought up the engineer in the first paragraph above. I
was simply responding to his comments. And that response addressed the
engineer solely, not amateur radio.


Likewise, few, if any, employers are seeking that "skill."
Therefore, it (code) simply isn't relevant to any of these
careers.


Neither are a whole lot of other things hams do!



Never said, suggested, or even hinted at, anything to the contrary. The
topic raised by Dick was the engineer, not amateur radio.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/