Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"N2EY" wrote:
"Dwight Stewart" writes: "Dick Carroll" wrote: I still find it beyond incredible that persons who would learn all that goes into making an engineer would have any problem whatever with learning the most basic radio communications skill at the most minimal level. Because, as far as the "engineer" is concerned, it (code) isn't a "basic radio communications skill" today, Dick. Perhaps - but we're amateurs, remember? Not professionals. Yes, I do remember, Jim. However, why are you asking me this question? Dick is the one who brought up the engineer in the first paragraph above. I was simply responding to his comments. And that response addressed the engineer solely, not amateur radio. Likewise, few, if any, employers are seeking that "skill." Therefore, it (code) simply isn't relevant to any of these careers. Neither are a whole lot of other things hams do! Never said, suggested, or even hinted at, anything to the contrary. The topic raised by Dick was the engineer, not amateur radio. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing | General | |||
Pixie 2 freq change question | Homebrew | |||
Pixie 2 freq change question | Homebrew | |||
Change of frequency of EM signal | Antenna | |||
SWR will change with Source Z if you measure AT the Source | Antenna |