View Single Post
  #114   Report Post  
Old January 31st 04, 10:08 PM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Wes Stewart wrote:

wrote:
|A quick scan of your article produces nothing new.

Fine. Then this thread is closed.


I apologize, Wes. After closer inspection, I have to disagree
with myself. Imax is the reference zero degree point for the
"cosine rule". If that point occurs inside the loading coil,
then the number of degrees occupied by the loading coil becomes
ArcCos(Iin/Imax) + ArcCos(Iout/Imax) This helps to resolve the
problem I was having with ArcCos(Iout/Iin). If, as you say, the
current maximum point occurs inside the coil, then the forward
current and reflected current are in-phase inside the coil and
the coil occupies much more of the antenna than ArcCos(Iout/Imax)
I do believe a "Thank you very much" is in order. For your antenna,
the calculated degrees that the coil occupies is within 1.5 degrees
of the estimated degrees.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----