In article k.net, "Bill
Sohl" writes:
"KØHB" wrote in message
news
The FCC doesn't have to prove anything. The burden of proof would
be on those that oppose what was done. Government regulations have a
presumption of legality to start with.
The question still is, what is the harm of such a one-time "fix."
Trivializing this as a one-time "fix" shows how little you've examined the
issue. Instead of a one-time "fix", it would be a one-time "hammer blow".
The answer still is exactly as stated in my previous message.
Cheerios and bran flakes to you to,
Careful, Bill, Hans might report you to somebody...or, at least,
vote against you in the next election... :-)
LHA