| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
January 2nd 04, 10:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
In article k.net, "Bill
Sohl" writes: "KØHB" wrote in message news  The FCC doesn't have to prove anything. The burden of proof would be on those that oppose what was done. Government regulations have a presumption of legality to start with. The question still is, what is the harm of such a one-time "fix." Trivializing this as a one-time "fix" shows how little you've examined the issue. Instead of a one-time "fix", it would be a one-time "hammer blow". The answer still is exactly as stated in my previous message. Cheerios and bran flakes to you to, Careful, Bill, Hans might report you to somebody...or, at least, vote against you in the next election... :-) LHA |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
| BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
| NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota | General | |||
| ARRL FUD about BPL | General | |||
Threaded Mode
