RadioBanter - View Single Post

March 3rd 04, 03:50 PM

(William) wrote in message om...
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message om...
(William) wrote in message . com...

TAFKA Rev Jim, I'll explain it to you. SA has two existing coded HF
licenses. ITU says you can drop code, so they come out with a third
coded license. Bizarre.

Question, Brain...

Brain?

I have never seen Jim Miccolis refer to you as anything but
"Brian"...

How is it that you misspell my name in one fragment sentence, and
spell it correctly in another?

Because, BRAIN, it's not about how I address YOU...It's about
why do YOU address Jim Miccolis with belittling endearments when
HE has never addressed YOU as anything except your proper name?

That scumbag you run with likes to do that. Jim has never
refered to him as anything but "Len", yet "Len" finds countless ways
to belittle him.

Lennie does that because he cannot "argue" or "debate" Jim
otherwise. He has to make Jim appear less-than-adequate in order to
promote himself. The weak minded and the foolish HAVE to do
that...It's a defense mechanism.

Are YOU that weak minded and foolish?

He did the same thing with me when he launched into allegations
of being a "jack booted thug", "Nazi", "elitist", "Dill Sergeant", etc
etc etc, when I had not so addressed him. He is treated and addressed
in the same tone and with the same viciousness as he unleashed.

Is that how you feel? Do YOU need to belittle Jim in order
to effectively express yourself when discussing things with/about him?

Please do not humiliate yourself by trying to misdirect this
question by asking ME about how I address Lennie...I've already
answered that.

Stay focused...you were asked a direct, specific question.

You CAN answer direct, specific questions, can't you?

So WHY do YOU inisist on following the insulting and demeaning
example of a known pathological liar and antagonist in engaging in any
interaction with him...?!?!

Stebe, you misunderstand (what's new?).

I am the ONE who has tagged N2EY with the title "TAFKA Rev. Jim" after
his dishonesty in altering Kim's posts. He previously put forth the
image of being as pure as the driven snow. But after that little
stunt, he can no longer be referred to as Reverend Jim. So, "formerly
known as" sounded good to me.

You got a problem with it?

I have a problem with you lying.

I have a problem with you following in the footsteps of a person
who is a known pathological liar and antagonist. It's embarrassing to
see a contemporary Veteran and Amateur licensee resorting to Lennie's
tactics.

As for what "sounded good to (you)"...My question STILL
remains...Did Jim refer to you by any name, title or endearment OTHER
than "Brian"...?!?!

If not, why do YOU find it necessary to do so...?!?!

Are you, after all, as shallow and immature as I thought you
really are?

No. Perhaps even more so. Perhaps almost as much as you are.

Brain, you will NEVER be as much as I am...good OR bad.

Please give some specific example of how Jim has belittled or
demeaned YOU in a like manner...

Why? Shallow and immature people don't have to follow your orders.

What "order", Brain...?!?!

I SAID "please"...And to have fulfilled my request would have only
served to explain why YOU find it necessary to be demeaning and
rude...OR have proven why you were right and I was wrong.

Instead, you choose to be even MORE argumentitive and demeaning,
even further cementing your reputation.

Stebe, take a chill pill or whatever meds you forgot to take.

Uh huh....Just after you take your distemper shot, Brain, and
answer the question put to you. WHY do you find it necessary to be
rude and demeaning when no such epithets were addressed to you...?!?!

Steve, K4YZ

PS: I will assume any answer to the question that attempts to
redirect or obfuscate the response to be "I am unwilling to directly
answer the question as I know the truth to be other than what I
stated". Simple enough?