Thread: Homebrew tuners
View Single Post
  #12   Report Post  
Old August 1st 03, 07:42 AM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 17:07:10 -0700, wrote:

Given that a 1dB change is NOT SUSPOSED to be noticed (without a meter, in
hearing, sight, ect. ), anyhow, Just what would be the Noticeable effect of
/ = .1 dB in the real world ? Would , say, 2/10's really kill you, or

1/100th dB extra get you that last DXCC country? As I say, am very cynical
when ANYTHING gets into these kinds of numbers! Jim NN7K

KB7QHC wrote:
-------------------------------------------------
50:12.5 Ohm with an insertion loss of around 0.1dB or less over the
interval of 100KHz to 30MHz.
AND THAT IS NOT THE BEST EXAMPLE OF LOW LOSS!
73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC


Hi Jim,

Cynical? This 0.1dB corresponds to about 2% error from perfect where
too many think that 5% error is the worst they have to suffer from
making a power measurement with their Bird (which actually doesn't do
nearly that well in the first place due to these accumulations of
error). It doesn't take long for error to accumulate to the 10's of
percent where you couldn't convince the bench tech that he has too
many places of precision in his pronouncement of measuring 104.5W
(when it was in fact closer to somewhere between 85W to 115W).

I can well anticipate the "so what?" rebuttal. "Who needs 5%
accuracy?" being another. The general rule of thumb demands that your
standard exhibit 3 times the accuracy of the instrument being
calibrated (the Bird is already dead on arrival using this 0.1dB loss,
if it were not characterized already). With an out of whack Bird, you
barely qualify any power measurement to within 15% (and there are more
sources of error than the BalUn used to isolate the Bird). Again, I
am being generous with the 3 times rule (professionals generally seek
5 times and are more comfortable with 10 times). But this is all
really the provence of the professional Metrologist, not the Amateur.
For the Bench Tech that confidently made the 104.5W measurement (not
knowing it was in fact closer to 60W) would hardly know it through
contacts where they barely noticed the less than 1 S-Unit difference.

Returning to this 0.1dB, it also represents a heat burden of 20W (or
more, I am being generous) for each 1KW passing through. This is a
lot of heat for small packages carelessly regarded as being trivial
(after-all, who can see 0.1dB on their S-Meter?). There have been
more than single reports of Hams writing here in astonishment of their
BalUns exploding. Blame the BalUn seems to be a popular ballad played
to that audience. Others pronounce with hushed tones of reverence
remonstrating mankind for drifting from the true path of the air wound
BalUn (or choke, what will you) mindless of the same loss, but
gratified through ignorance of the greater heat mass.

This 0.1dB in the wrong hands is clearly an example of extravagant
dismissal or myopic attention. And speaking of hands, how long would
you consider it trivial if you had to hold onto the sucker for 20
seconds?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC