Good evening Art, I have a few minutes to put some thoughts on email 
regarding efficiency per unit length of an antenna, or antenna elements. 
I hope I don't glaze your eyes :-) 
 
Efficiency by definition is work delivered to a load divided by the 
total work available. 
 
The work [power] delivered to the load is the work available minus 
losses all divided by work available. Your car engine may have 100 
horsepower available but losses [heat] in the transmission, drive shaft, 
differential, oils, fluids, bearings, tires and wheels may limit 
horsepower delivered to the road to 30 horsepower. In this model then 
the efficiency is 30%. 
 
Note: bandwidth is not a factor. It is total work[power] delivered 
divided by total work[power] available. 
 
For an antenna the following definition is applicable by similarity: 
 
Efficiency = Radiated Power/Total power. By definition an antenna is a 
linear device and the Principle of Reciprocity is applicable. That is, 
it has the same efficiency either transmitting or receiving. 
 
Now, total power = I^2*Reffective 
 
Reffective = Radiation Resistance [Rradiation] + Loss Resistance. 
 
Radiated Power = I^2*Rradiation. 
 
Where I = Io*cos[wt + b]. Where wt = frequency, b = phase shift along 
antenna element. 
 
By definition radiation resistance is that determined by integrating the 
total radiated power over the surface of the sphere containing that 
power. [1] For a half wave dipole that converges to the value at a 
current maximum. So, radiation resistance for a 1/2 wave infinitely thin 
dipole is 73 ohms at the current maximum.[1] 
 
As one moves away from the current maximum the radiation resistance 
increases as 1/cosine(angle from the maximum)^2 i.e. 1/cos^2[theta].[2] 
 
Now, in a uniform cross section antenna the Loss Resistance per unit 
length is constant. 
 
So, the Radiation Resistance at the ends of the antenna is infinite. 
[Cosine 90 degrees = 0] That means the efficiency at the ends of a 1/2 
wavelength dipole is 100%. Isn't that a surprise?? [It's the same for a 
dipole or a Yagi!!!!] 
 
The Radiation Resistance at the 45 degree point from the current maximum 
of a thin 1/2 wavelength dipole is 73 ohms/(cos^2(45 degrees)) = 146 Ohms. 
 
The conclusion is that the efficiency of an antenna element varies along 
it's length and can vary between maximum of infinity at the ends and 
have a minimum value, that depends on the length of the antenna, at a 
current maximum. 
 
The total antenna efficiency is measured in the radiated pattern by 
integrating the power density per square steradian [or square degrees] 
over the full surface of a sphere divided by the power into the antenna. 
 
So, a Yagi with 8.14 dBi (6 dBd + 2.14 dBi) gain has concentrated it's 
radiated power into 15.38% of the three dimensional space defined by the 
surface of a sphere. [See Note 1.] Now if the Yagi is 95 % efficient and 
a dipole is 95% efficient the 6 dBd value remains constant. 
 
_____________ 
Note 1 [I'm using degrees instead of steradians to simplify 
understanding. The Science/math is the same] 
 
The diameter of the earth is 360 degrees as measured from E-W and N-S. 
The surface is then proportional to 360^2 = 129600 square degrees. [I 
will be dividing the constant Pi in a subsequent step so it is deleted 
here.] 
 
A 6 dBd Yagi is also +2.14 dBi giving a net gain of 8.14 dBi. This 
normalizes the value to a sphere. 
 
So, 8.14 dBi = 10*Log(129600/X) 
X = 19938.4 square degrees. 
 
The Yagi has concentrated it's pattern into a piece of the surface of 
the sphere that represents 15.38% of the total surface [19938.4/129600]. 
This is Gain NOT efficiency. 
 
_____________ 
Reference [1]: Antennas, Kraus, McGraw-Hill 1950, Chapter 5, section 
5-6, pages 143-146. 
 
Reference [2]: Antennas, Kraus, McGraw-Hill 1950, Chapter 5, section 
5-7, pages 147-148. 
 
 
 
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 |