Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good evening Art, I have a few minutes to put some thoughts on email
regarding efficiency per unit length of an antenna, or antenna elements. I hope I don't glaze your eyes :-) Efficiency by definition is work delivered to a load divided by the total work available. The work [power] delivered to the load is the work available minus losses all divided by work available. Your car engine may have 100 horsepower available but losses [heat] in the transmission, drive shaft, differential, oils, fluids, bearings, tires and wheels may limit horsepower delivered to the road to 30 horsepower. In this model then the efficiency is 30%. Note: bandwidth is not a factor. It is total work[power] delivered divided by total work[power] available. For an antenna the following definition is applicable by similarity: Efficiency = Radiated Power/Total power. By definition an antenna is a linear device and the Principle of Reciprocity is applicable. That is, it has the same efficiency either transmitting or receiving. Now, total power = I^2*Reffective Reffective = Radiation Resistance [Rradiation] + Loss Resistance. Radiated Power = I^2*Rradiation. Where I = Io*cos[wt + b]. Where wt = frequency, b = phase shift along antenna element. By definition radiation resistance is that determined by integrating the total radiated power over the surface of the sphere containing that power. [1] For a half wave dipole that converges to the value at a current maximum. So, radiation resistance for a 1/2 wave infinitely thin dipole is 73 ohms at the current maximum.[1] As one moves away from the current maximum the radiation resistance increases as 1/cosine(angle from the maximum)^2 i.e. 1/cos^2[theta].[2] Now, in a uniform cross section antenna the Loss Resistance per unit length is constant. So, the Radiation Resistance at the ends of the antenna is infinite. [Cosine 90 degrees = 0] That means the efficiency at the ends of a 1/2 wavelength dipole is 100%. Isn't that a surprise?? [It's the same for a dipole or a Yagi!!!!] The Radiation Resistance at the 45 degree point from the current maximum of a thin 1/2 wavelength dipole is 73 ohms/(cos^2(45 degrees)) = 146 Ohms. The conclusion is that the efficiency of an antenna element varies along it's length and can vary between maximum of infinity at the ends and have a minimum value, that depends on the length of the antenna, at a current maximum. The total antenna efficiency is measured in the radiated pattern by integrating the power density per square steradian [or square degrees] over the full surface of a sphere divided by the power into the antenna. So, a Yagi with 8.14 dBi (6 dBd + 2.14 dBi) gain has concentrated it's radiated power into 15.38% of the three dimensional space defined by the surface of a sphere. [See Note 1.] Now if the Yagi is 95 % efficient and a dipole is 95% efficient the 6 dBd value remains constant. _____________ Note 1 [I'm using degrees instead of steradians to simplify understanding. The Science/math is the same] The diameter of the earth is 360 degrees as measured from E-W and N-S. The surface is then proportional to 360^2 = 129600 square degrees. [I will be dividing the constant Pi in a subsequent step so it is deleted here.] A 6 dBd Yagi is also +2.14 dBi giving a net gain of 8.14 dBi. This normalizes the value to a sphere. So, 8.14 dBi = 10*Log(129600/X) X = 19938.4 square degrees. The Yagi has concentrated it's pattern into a piece of the surface of the sphere that represents 15.38% of the total surface [19938.4/129600]. This is Gain NOT efficiency. _____________ Reference [1]: Antennas, Kraus, McGraw-Hill 1950, Chapter 5, section 5-6, pages 143-146. Reference [2]: Antennas, Kraus, McGraw-Hill 1950, Chapter 5, section 5-7, pages 147-148. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit | Antenna | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna |