Subject: Canadian No Code Proposal Open For Comment
From: (William)
Date: 9/10/2004 5:33 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:
(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message
...
Subject: Canadian No Code Proposal Open For Comment
From: (William)
Date: 9/8/2004 6:01 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:
(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message
...
Nope. Those are your exact words, and you have had months to retract it.
Instead, you defend it.
That's because I believe it. AND I am willing to sign my name to it.
Well there you go. And quit whining whenever I bring it up.
I am not whining, Brain.
I am defending my convictions.
You wouldn't know about that.
If you had been any part of it you'd understand.
You are a person of no convictions, Brain.
It really is THAT simple.
You cannot be that simple.
YOU, on the otherhand, have also had "months" to provide some evidence
that
backs up your "unlicensed services play a major role in emergency comms"
faux
pas,
I saw cell phones used by emergency pers on the television all last
week. I suspect that I'll see them in use again this week.
A cellphone is not an "unlicensed" device. The end user does not have a
license, however the provider of the service sure does and could not operate
the system without one.
Ask the FCC.
The thread in which you made your pronouncement on "unlicensed devices"
specificallly asked you about Part 15 and Part 95 issues. You said, yes,
those.
I really don't want to spend a lot of time wading through all those posts
to find it, Brain, but if it means one more opportunity to plant a flag in your
ear after having again disproven even more of your silly assertions, then I
will.
Steve, K4YZ