LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Report Post  
Old September 11th 04, 01:14 AM
Steve Robeson K4CAP
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Subject: Canadian No Code Proposal Open For Comment
From: (William)
Date: 9/10/2004 5:33 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message
...
Subject: Canadian No Code Proposal Open For Comment
From:
(William)
Date: 9/8/2004 6:01 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message
...


Nope. Those are your exact words, and you have had months to retract it.

Instead, you defend it.


That's because I believe it. AND I am willing to sign my name to it.


Well there you go. And quit whining whenever I bring it up.


I am not whining, Brain.

I am defending my convictions.

You wouldn't know about that.

If you had been any part of it you'd understand.

You are a person of no convictions, Brain.

It really is THAT simple.


You cannot be that simple.

YOU, on the otherhand, have also had "months" to provide some evidence

that
backs up your "unlicensed services play a major role in emergency comms"

faux
pas,


I saw cell phones used by emergency pers on the television all last
week. I suspect that I'll see them in use again this week.


A cellphone is not an "unlicensed" device. The end user does not have a
license, however the provider of the service sure does and could not operate
the system without one.

Ask the FCC.

The thread in which you made your pronouncement on "unlicensed devices"
specificallly asked you about Part 15 and Part 95 issues. You said, yes,
those.

I really don't want to spend a lot of time wading through all those posts
to find it, Brain, but if it means one more opportunity to plant a flag in your
ear after having again disproven even more of your silly assertions, then I
will.

Steve, K4YZ







 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) N2EY Policy 6 December 2nd 03 04:45 AM
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC Brian Policy 3 October 24th 03 01:02 AM
Comments to FCC on RM-10787 No Code Proposal Emmersom Bigguns Policy 0 September 6th 03 05:27 AM
Some comments on the NCVEC petition D. Stussy Policy 13 August 5th 03 05:23 AM
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. Keith Policy 1 July 31st 03 04:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017