View Single Post
  #6   Report Post  
Old October 16th 04, 08:33 PM
Mike Coslo
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Bill Sohl wrote:
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message
...

Dee D. Flint wrote:


The ARRL is now projecting that it will take the FCC until at least


sometime

in 2006 to make any changes.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


Yup! Easily then if not later. If the current administration is still
in at that time, it may even be later - if at all. Remember that
conservative folks of the neo stripe *don't* like treaties, and this is
a treaty matter.


Mike,


Where you been Bill? I haven't read one of your posts in a while.


Why do you consider this a treaty matter today?


Well, it kinda is! But read on.

While the current
treaty may not yet have gone through Senate approval, surely aren't
suggesting (or maybe you are) that anyone here (USA) or elsewhere
considers the prior treaty still in effect.


You do raise a good point, since the present Powers that be might not
consider themselves bound by the treaty anyhow.

But this will still probably take longer than any of us that made
thoughtful predictions thought. 8^)

- Mike KB3EIA -