Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Bill Sohl wrote: "Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... Dee D. Flint wrote: The ARRL is now projecting that it will take the FCC until at least sometime in 2006 to make any changes. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Yup! Easily then if not later. If the current administration is still in at that time, it may even be later - if at all. Remember that conservative folks of the neo stripe *don't* like treaties, and this is a treaty matter. Mike, Where you been Bill? I haven't read one of your posts in a while. Why do you consider this a treaty matter today? Well, it kinda is! But read on. While the current treaty may not yet have gone through Senate approval, surely aren't suggesting (or maybe you are) that anyone here (USA) or elsewhere considers the prior treaty still in effect. You do raise a good point, since the present Powers that be might not consider themselves bound by the treaty anyhow. But this will still probably take longer than any of us that made thoughtful predictions thought. 8^) - Mike KB3EIA - |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
US Licensing Restructuring ??? When ??? | Policy | |||
US Licensing Restructuring ??? When ??? | Policy | |||
US Licensing Restructuring ??? When ??? | Policy | |||
Ham Congressmen support restructuring | General | |||
My restructuring proposal | Policy |