View Single Post
  #5   Report Post  
Old December 16th 04, 05:20 AM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

N2EY wrote:
In article . net,

robert casey
writes:

A big reason for SSB is that, in a pile up, the
receiving station can make out people's voices
without carrier heterodyne whistles.


Not just in a pileup, either.

Also no
wasted power transmitting carriers. Take a
listen to a crouded CB channel sometime and hear
all those heterodyne whistles.


I'll take your word for it ;-)

The biggest reasons for SSB displacing AM on the ham bands, IMHO,

a

1) Allows more simultaneous QSOs in a given amount of spectrum
2) Greater "talk power" from a given rig (all the power is in the

sidebands on
SSB vs. ~2/3 of it in the carrier on AM)
3) High power SSB can be less expensive to build and operate than

high power
AM.

RTTY: 1.5%
FM/NBFM: 0.3%

NBFM might have been better than SSB except it's
wider bandwidth...


No, NBFM was even worse than AM in terms of "talk power". At the

narrow
deviations allowed for hams below 29 MHz, an NBFM transmitter was

roughly
equivalent to an AM transmitter running one-fourth the power. OTOH

heterodynes
were much reduced - capture effect meant you heard the strongest

signal and
little else.

Other modes: 0.6%

VHF/UHF (all modes): 12.1%


Even back then, half the hams perferred voice
(phone) modes (AM, SSB, FM). Compared to a bit
over 1/3 perferring CW.


Yep - despite the fact that in those days the spectrum available for

US hams to
use HF 'phone was much less than today. And the rig-cost differential

was much
greater. No WARC bands back then, and 160 wasn't included in the

survey.

It should be remembered that in 1961:

- only ~8 years had passed since Generals and Conditionals got access

to HF
'phone on the ham bands between 2 and 25 MHz

- only ~7 years had passed since 'phone was allowed on 40 meters, and

15 meters
was opened to hams

- there were less than a quarter million US hams

- VHF/UHF repeaters were almost unknown on the ham bands. RTTY meant

an
electromechanical teleprinter in the shack, whose cost new exceeded

the cost of
many hams' entire stations.

It would be interesting to see how the mode and band use would break

down
today.

73 de Jim, N2EY