Thread
:
More Truckers Busted Using Modified CB's on Ham 10m Band
View Single Post
#
51
May 21st 04, 04:20 PM
Twistedhed
Posts: n/a
From:
(Dave=A0Hall)
On Fri, 21 May 2004 00:57:24 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:
The point is that making a statement that 99% of cb'rs operate illegally
is false, just as 99% of hams get busted for operating illegally.
I try to avoid making specific number
comparisons
Since when? This morning? You have presented such specific number
"comparisons"
on several occasions in order to shore up a claim of yours, with nothing
to back it up except your "claim"..
since hard data is not usually
easy to collect.
But I would hope that you'd agree that a
definite majority of CB'ers are running illegally
in one form or another.
Majority? Hahha,,that would equal exactly what you said you do not
do,,,,more than 51%...LOL....your hypocrisy radiates bull****.
I have certainly seen enough empirical data in
my many years of the hobby to make that
claim.
But of course, you can point to or illustrate *none* of this "empirical"
(snicker) data,,,you want only to be taken at your word,,,something you
ruined long ago, but I will give you another benefit of doubt,,,present
something of this "empirical" data, as "empirical" means "provable or
verifiable by experience or experiment". Merely claiming somehting is
empirical does not make it so. Do something you have never been able to
do for the masses, Davie,,prove your bull**** claim.
It's one thing to be "busted" for operating
illegally, It's totally another to just be
"operating" illegally. It's true that a higher
percentage of hams are busted for operating
illegally than there are CB'ers popped for
illegal operation. But for the most part it can
be explained that hams themselves have
requested stricter enforcement.
It can also be argued, for the most part, it can be explained" that
hammmies have also requested stricter enforcement against cbers as
well,,,,,,it simply doesn't make it so and your claim was fabricated
simply to suit your own warped politics.
In other words, just because there are a
higher number of reported enforcement
actions against hams vs. CB'ers, does not
mean that there is a higher percentage of
hams operating illegally.
It also can be stated with incredible accuracy, that simply because you
categorically and vehemently stated you can prove something, doesn't
mean you actually can or will. In other words, you're full of bull****
as usual.
Dave
"Sandbagger"
N3CVJ
http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj
Reply With Quote