View Single Post
  #51   Report Post  
Old May 21st 04, 04:20 PM
Twistedhed
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Fri, 21 May 2004 00:57:24 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:
The point is that making a statement that 99% of cb'rs operate illegally
is false, just as 99% of hams get busted for operating illegally.

I try to avoid making specific number


comparisons



Since when? This morning? You have presented such specific number
"comparisons"
on several occasions in order to shore up a claim of yours, with nothing
to back it up except your "claim"..

since hard data is not usually


easy to collect.




But I would hope that you'd agree that a


definite majority of CB'ers are running illegally


in one form or another.




Majority? Hahha,,that would equal exactly what you said you do not
do,,,,more than 51%...LOL....your hypocrisy radiates bull****.


I have certainly seen enough empirical data in


my many years of the hobby to make that


claim.




But of course, you can point to or illustrate *none* of this "empirical"
(snicker) data,,,you want only to be taken at your word,,,something you
ruined long ago, but I will give you another benefit of doubt,,,present
something of this "empirical" data, as "empirical" means "provable or
verifiable by experience or experiment". Merely claiming somehting is
empirical does not make it so. Do something you have never been able to
do for the masses, Davie,,prove your bull**** claim.


It's one thing to be "busted" for operating


illegally, It's totally another to just be


"operating" illegally. It's true that a higher


percentage of hams are busted for operating


illegally than there are CB'ers popped for


illegal operation. But for the most part it can


be explained that hams themselves have


requested stricter enforcement.



It can also be argued, for the most part, it can be explained" that
hammmies have also requested stricter enforcement against cbers as
well,,,,,,it simply doesn't make it so and your claim was fabricated
simply to suit your own warped politics.


In other words, just because there are a


higher number of reported enforcement


actions against hams vs. CB'ers, does not


mean that there is a higher percentage of


hams operating illegally.




It also can be stated with incredible accuracy, that simply because you
categorically and vehemently stated you can prove something, doesn't
mean you actually can or will. In other words, you're full of bull****
as usual.


Dave


"Sandbagger"


N3CVJ


http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj