About Us

May 21st 04, 05:20 PM

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Fri, 21 May 2004 00:57:24 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:
The point is that making a statement that 99% of cb'rs operate illegally
is false, just as 99% of hams get busted for operating illegally.

I try to avoid making specific number

comparisons

Since when? This morning? You have presented such specific number
"comparisons"
on several occasions in order to shore up a claim of yours, with nothing
to back it up except your "claim"..

since hard data is not usually

easy to collect.

But I would hope that you'd agree that a

definite majority of CB'ers are running illegally

in one form or another.

Majority? Hahha,,that would equal exactly what you said you do not
do,,,,more than 51%...LOL....your hypocrisy radiates bull****.

I have certainly seen enough empirical data in

my many years of the hobby to make that

claim.

But of course, you can point to or illustrate *none* of this "empirical"
(snicker) data,,,you want only to be taken at your word,,,something you
ruined long ago, but I will give you another benefit of doubt,,,present
something of this "empirical" data, as "empirical" means "provable or
verifiable by experience or experiment". Merely claiming somehting is
empirical does not make it so. Do something you have never been able to
do for the masses, Davie,,prove your bull**** claim.

It's one thing to be "busted" for operating

illegally, It's totally another to just be

"operating" illegally. It's true that a higher

percentage of hams are busted for operating

illegally than there are CB'ers popped for

illegal operation. But for the most part it can

be explained that hams themselves have

requested stricter enforcement.

It can also be argued, for the most part, it can be explained" that
hammmies have also requested stricter enforcement against cbers as
well,,,,,,it simply doesn't make it so and your claim was fabricated
simply to suit your own warped politics.

In other words, just because there are a

higher number of reported enforcement

actions against hams vs. CB'ers, does not

mean that there is a higher percentage of

hams operating illegally.

It also can be stated with incredible accuracy, that simply because you
categorically and vehemently stated you can prove something, doesn't
mean you actually can or will. In other words, you're full of bull****
as usual.

Dave

"Sandbagger"

N3CVJ

http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
FM Broadcast band as we know it going away?	Robert Hovland	Broadcasting	36	October 9th 13 08:36 PM
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems	Paul	Policy	0	January 10th 05 06:41 PM
magic band and baby monitors	PDRUNEN	Homebrew	8	July 22nd 04 02:19 AM
Muilti band quad with a single loop?	tj	Antenna	2	July 21st 04 08:24 PM
keyclown radio dealers busted in spokane WA and walcott IW	I Am Not George	CB	1	April 17th 04 08:50 PM

Menu

About Us