RadioBanter - View Single Post - NY TIMES says new super-small Hammie Antenna defies physics

June 12th 04, 08:08 PM

John Randall wrote:
On 11 Jun 2004 18:33:33 -0700, (I Am Not
George) wrote:

John Randall wrote:
On 11 Jun 2004 15:26:30 -0700, (I Am Not
George) wrote:

(Snotgeorge) wrote:
On 11 Jun 2004 13:03:58 -0700,
(I Am Not George) wrote:

no I said a dummy load is very small and will work on 160 as
well but

do go on your embarassing yourself tell me how a 46 foot long
160
meter antenna made up of loading coils defies physics
Twistednuts

no,that is not what you said. you said

(snip)

got you spinning now humpy, LOL

Why did you snip his post?

to make you break out another alias, humpy. and it worked lol

Alias? Its not an alias, its my real name. Unlike you which prefer
to hide behind an obvious made name. If you are to ignorant to
answer
the question, just admit your to ignorant. So nothing worked for
you,
except you made yourself look more ignorant.

so Im supposed to to believe theres a sudden ground swell of real
people that share Twistedheds views?? ROTFLMMFAO I dont think so