"dude!" wrote in message ...

"Psychiatrist to keyclowns" wrote in message
om...
"Kevin Muenzler, WB5RUE" wrote in message
...
It's always been my position on "gay" issues. You are either for the
"gay
lifestyle" and believe their lifestyle is not an abomination or you are
against the "gay lifestyle" and believe that it is an abomination. You
are
either pro-gay lifestyle or anti-gay lifestyle. To make no decision is
to
have already made a decision.

I have several friends who are gay, both male and female. I treat them
just
as I treat everyone else, with respect. They also know how I feel
about
homosexuality, we are still friends. I don't insult them, I don't call
them
fags, homos or any of other disgusting terms that I can think of.

As far as the "original post" goes I didn't see it, my news reader only
gets
the past five days posts. If I'm away for a week I miss some. I don't
have
to download 10000 messages if I'm away for a couple of weeks.

If the context has anything to do with the subject my position still
fits.
You can and should be nice to gays without agreeing with their
lifestyle.



--
Kevin Muenzler, WB5RUE
Eagle Creek Observatory
http://www.eaglecreekobservatory.org
I am Voltohm of Borg. Resistance is E/I, power is EI, you will be
attenuated!


"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:50:08 -0500, "Kevin Muenzler, WB5RUE"
wrote in :

You are either anti-gay or pro-gay, there is no in-between.


Is that your position regardless of the context of the original post?

In any case that's just mopeydopey forging because he has so totally
lost the ability to prevail and feels the desparation of his loss so
deeply he will try anything to regain ground.

...and your point is? I'm not mopar.

You are either for the gay political positions and support their lifestyle
or you are against it. To not have a position is to have taken a
position,
if you are not against it then you are for it. There is no middle ground.

Kevin, WB5RUE



You are a real nutcase, aren't you? What the hell does the gender of
another's sexual partner concern you? Why would you care either way? There
is lots of middle ground. I am against you being allowed to have a say-so in
anything, but then again, that's not my right, now is it? As such, you can
now take your lame argument elsewhere. You don't matter.