"AKC" wrote in message
...
---------------------------------------------------

"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...
You and Frank need to do some more reading. The appeal court process is
there too, but both of you like to conveniently ignore it. As far as
the
regulations go, that they are only++"rules",++go tell that to an
attorney
and watch him laugh at you. Better yet get a NAL yourself and tell that
wopper to the judge.


++++++++ You don't comprehend it do you? You can not contest a
NAL in a court of law, you have to contest it before the FCC.
If you lose, you can then take it to civil court. As for the rules/
law, most of the FCC codes are only rules, as such the FCC enforces them
with NAL's, that's how they circumvent the legal system.
++++ I don't have to worry about NAL Lee, you would have more
to worry about than I.

++++++++ Landshark

how do you figure that? Lee is a licensed ham who operates legally. You
are an unlicensed keyclown who freebands and operates illegal amps.


How do you figure that Geo? I own a Cobra 148,
have lot of amps, not a one near a radio, all collecting
dust on the shelf's, I don't freeband and don't think I've
ever claimed to freeband.

Yawnnnnnnnnnnn, don't you get tired of being
the only trouble maker? You enjoy being the only
other trouble maker here along with Doug?

Landshark


--
That does suck..sometimes you're the
windshield..sometimes you're the bug.