"WShoots1" wrote in message
...

[snip]


I do think WWW should have a more convenient form. I suppose when it
was sent
in a certain context, a single W would be understood. Maybe a W3...
Unless
one's call sign begins with that. G

Bill, K5BY

How about 3W, then? There won't be any conflict with 3WE, now that
they're WTAM again.

Frank Dresser