| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#12
January 6th 04, 09:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
"WShoots1" wrote in message ... [snip] I do think WWW should have a more convenient form. I suppose when it was sent in a certain context, a single W would be understood. Maybe a W3... Unless one's call sign begins with that. G Bill, K5BY How about 3W, then? There won't be any conflict with 3WE, now that they're WTAM again. Frank Dresser |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| BBC Says Morse Code Still Alive and Well In UK | Policy | |||
| Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
| My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
| Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
| NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy | |||
Threaded Mode
