mAximo wrote:

A hypochondria-mongering huckster for the tin-foil-hat industry,
Occasional AB Listener, wrote in

Tonight (March 20, 2004), at 10:05 Pacific Time on "Coast to Coast A.M,"
late-night radio talk-show host Art Bell is going to take a breather
from the customary paranormal and conspiracy-related format and discuss
a topic that will interest most --
snip
Could a substantial increase in RF exposure -- especially around the
household -- contribute to the rise in cancer-related diseases?



It's a rhetorical question, Mr. Lachman. Some supporters of BPL say
that there are no health risks involved, while some of the opponents say
that there are documented cases of health risks. It's like the
researchers and scientists paid for by the nuclear energy industry
telling us that nuclear power is harmless to the general population. In
fact, some of the bigwigs who support the transportation of nuclear
waste say that nuclear material is safe even when the transporters are
involved in a serious traffic accident.

What is your take on the issue, Mr. Lachman? Is there any documentation
from other countries to prove or disprove the possibility of any serious
health risks involved with the use of BPL?



Occasional AB (Art Bell) Listener