Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
mAximo wrote:
A hypochondria-mongering huckster for the tin-foil-hat industry, Occasional AB Listener, wrote in Tonight (March 20, 2004), at 10:05 Pacific Time on "Coast to Coast A.M," late-night radio talk-show host Art Bell is going to take a breather from the customary paranormal and conspiracy-related format and discuss a topic that will interest most -- snip Could a substantial increase in RF exposure -- especially around the household -- contribute to the rise in cancer-related diseases? It's a rhetorical question, Mr. Lachman. Some supporters of BPL say that there are no health risks involved, while some of the opponents say that there are documented cases of health risks. It's like the researchers and scientists paid for by the nuclear energy industry telling us that nuclear power is harmless to the general population. In fact, some of the bigwigs who support the transportation of nuclear waste say that nuclear material is safe even when the transporters are involved in a serious traffic accident. What is your take on the issue, Mr. Lachman? Is there any documentation from other countries to prove or disprove the possibility of any serious health risks involved with the use of BPL? Occasional AB (Art Bell) Listener |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
mAximo wrote:
A hypochondria-mongering huckster for the tin-foil-hat industry, Occasional AB Listener, wrote in Tonight (March 20, 2004), at 10:05 Pacific Time on "Coast to Coast A.M," late-night radio talk-show host Art Bell is going to take a breather from the customary paranormal and conspiracy-related format and discuss a topic that will interest most -- snip Could a substantial increase in RF exposure -- especially around the household -- contribute to the rise in cancer-related diseases? It's a rhetorical question, Mr. Lachman. Some supporters of BPL say that there are no health risks involved, while some of the opponents say that there are documented cases of health risks. It's like the researchers and scientists paid for by the nuclear energy industry telling us that nuclear power is harmless to the general population. In fact, some of the bigwigs who support the transportation of nuclear waste say that nuclear material is safe even when the transporters are involved in a serious traffic accident. What is your take on the issue, Mr. Lachman? Is there any documentation from other countries to prove or disprove the possibility of any serious health risks involved with the use of BPL, especially in Europe and Japan? Let's see what fellow ham radio operators have to say about this issue. Occasional AB (Art Bell) Listener |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hardline useage, pro's and cons | Antenna | |||
kaito KA1102 pros and cons | Shortwave |