MnM,
Name me one war where there were no innocents killed? JD was pointing out
that due to the fact these animals hide amongst the civilian population,
eradicating them IS very difficult. Especially when trying to minimize said
causalities.
Let me correct you on these fine points.
First the Islam-O-Fascist do not only Hide among the Civilian Population:
* They do not wear uniforms and dress as Civilians as a "Form of
Camouflage".
* They use Human Shields (Women and Children) when it suits their
purposes; with the Intent to make the fighting more difficult
and Dangerous for the US Forces.
Second to Islam-O-Fascist 'every' Dead and Wounded Civilian (Women and
Children) are a "Powerful Propaganda" Tool in their Terrorist War.
* The Islam-O-Fascist is 'interested' in "Maximizing" the Civilian
Casualties as a Propaganda Weapon.
* Propaganda is an Important "Weapon of Warfare" and as 'potent'
as a Army.
jm2cw ~ RHF
..
..
= = = "MnMikew" wrote in message
= = = ...
"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...
From: "MnMikew"
And your a debate judge? Funny I didnt read that JD was advocating the
slaughter of innocents. Though, in typical Bryant fashion, you bend his
words to meet your twisted agenda. I feel sorry for any kids who were
duped
into signing up for your class.
Then read JD's words. He advocates slaughter of the terrorists and says
it's
their fault if civilians get killed, because terrorists hide among
civilians.
He clearly places eradication of the terrorists above any concern for
non-terrorist Muslim civilians. I guess you missed that? Advocacy means
being
accountable for inevitable implications.
But hey, you've never had any logic, advocacy or argumentation classes at
all,
right?
Wow. I'm so impressed.
Name me one war where there were no innocents killed? JD was pointing out
that due to the fact these animals hide amongst the civilian population,
eradicating them IS very difficult. Especially when trying to minimize said
causalities.
You may want to look up the word advocacy.
Nobody needs a class to out debate you.