View Single Post
  #19   Report Post  
Old May 15th 04, 08:13 PM
Michael Bryant
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: "Stinger"

Like JD, I do appreciate civil discourse without name-calling. However,
once again, you have illustrated how you lower the bar, then whine when
someone swats back (or does the same).


JD is hardly without any responsiblilty. I defy you to see how far back you
have to go to find some posts of his to me where he isn't being insulting.

Michael, I don't think I've ever seen you get into much more than a
two-response thread without slamming the other poster's intelligence,
reading comprehension, etc., and though many do respond in a like manner,
I've yet to see some posters reply in-kind. You probably don't realize
this, but it's almost down to a formula. If I had time to waste, I could
build a "check sheet" for an MWB response.


And you know (or at least you said so in backchannels!) that there are others
in this NG who you don't have to wait until the second response before they
belittle you with insults. Why don't you berate them the same way you do me. In
public, that is. Is it because they're on your side?



That's awfully tiresome drivel from somebody that fancies himself as a
professional (with credentials) in debating.

My disagreement with JD's opinion on Betz's post is not about tone, it's
about factual content, which is close to nil. Give me facts, THEN present a
case for opinion based on the facts. Betz posts opinion, and the facts are
completely missing (and for good reason -- he's wrong). I don't debate
fiction.

-- Stinger










My disagreement with JD's opinion on Betz's post is not about tone, it's
about factual content, which is close to nil. Give me facts, THEN present a
case for opinion based on the facts. Betz posts opinion, and the facts are
completely missing (and for good reason -- he's wrong). I don't debate
fiction.

-- Stinger


But you accept OPINION on your side as FACT. Betz provides more supporting
FACTS than does JD's OPINIONS. but you treat JD's discourse as factual. How can
you even pretend to be objective?


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)