LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17   Report Post  
Old May 15th 04, 09:13 PM
Michael Bryant
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: "Stinger"

Like JD, I do appreciate civil discourse without name-calling. However,
once again, you have illustrated how you lower the bar, then whine when
someone swats back (or does the same).


JD is hardly without any responsiblilty. I defy you to see how far back you
have to go to find some posts of his to me where he isn't being insulting.

Michael, I don't think I've ever seen you get into much more than a
two-response thread without slamming the other poster's intelligence,
reading comprehension, etc., and though many do respond in a like manner,
I've yet to see some posters reply in-kind. You probably don't realize
this, but it's almost down to a formula. If I had time to waste, I could
build a "check sheet" for an MWB response.


And you know (or at least you said so in backchannels!) that there are others
in this NG who you don't have to wait until the second response before they
belittle you with insults. Why don't you berate them the same way you do me. In
public, that is. Is it because they're on your side?



That's awfully tiresome drivel from somebody that fancies himself as a
professional (with credentials) in debating.

My disagreement with JD's opinion on Betz's post is not about tone, it's
about factual content, which is close to nil. Give me facts, THEN present a
case for opinion based on the facts. Betz posts opinion, and the facts are
completely missing (and for good reason -- he's wrong). I don't debate
fiction.

-- Stinger










My disagreement with JD's opinion on Betz's post is not about tone, it's
about factual content, which is close to nil. Give me facts, THEN present a
case for opinion based on the facts. Betz posts opinion, and the facts are
completely missing (and for good reason -- he's wrong). I don't debate
fiction.

-- Stinger


But you accept OPINION on your side as FACT. Betz provides more supporting
FACTS than does JD's OPINIONS. but you treat JD's discourse as factual. How can
you even pretend to be objective?


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
can space shuttle video be recieved on the IC-R3??? Mediaguy500 Scanner 5 June 13th 04 07:26 AM
New Zealand video downlinks John Burns Scanner 3 March 16th 04 03:18 AM
FS: USA Video Surveillance & Detection Directory - 2004 Edition john wilson Scanner 0 January 24th 04 11:37 PM
WTC Video 9-11-01 Bruce Markowitz Scanner 8 September 12th 03 12:49 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017