dxAce wrote:
dxAce wrote:
Llgpt wrote:
Subject: '60 Minutes' Documents on Bush Might Be Fake
From: Sir Cumference
Date: 9/10/2004 12:15 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:
Michael Bryant wrote:
Regarding the charge that the fonts prove the documents are fake:
BZZZZT! Try again. The White House distributed the memos ...
BZZZZT!! Wrong again mickeyboy, CBS faxed the memos to the White House.
Now go wipe you nose and finish you cookies and milk.
LOL!! Why don't you wipe "your" nose and finish "your" cookies and milk.
English and spelling are not your strong point.
But he did get his point across, did he not?
Here's an example: Les Locklear fax's me fake documents. I release said
documents to the public, indicating that they came from Les Locklear.
How does/or would that make me responsible in any way for the fact that they
were fakes?
Depends upon if you are touting the information in those documents as
being true are not. If you are touting the contents of the documents as
truth, you should be verifying the validy of the documents.