"-=jd=-" wrote in message
...
On Sat 13 Nov 2004 04:53:51p, "Frank Dresser"
wrote in message
t:
"-=jd=-" wrote in message
...
Back when I was toying with a DRM signal, I was able to
get 10 to 15 seconds worth (before drop-out) with an
unmodified PCR- 1000 simply be using ssb and tuning down a
bit. I also had to set Dream to reverse some setting in
the software that I can't recall at the moment. It was the
only setting that allowed you to reverse/invert some
aspect of the processing.
-=jd=-
Yeah, those were interesting posts. That's what triggered
my thoughts on using a computer as a DRM detector with the
62 and feeding the signal back to radio's hi-fi audio
section. The experiment would be cheap enough for me, and
it's probably doable, but I'm just not interested enough in
DRM to start playing with it.
Frank Dresser
The one thing I got to hear most of was the undecoded signal -
As soothing as a bored 8-year old with a 100-foot length of
bubble-wrap. But for 10 to 15 seconds at a time, the decoded
signal quality was *scary* nice. I would have to say it was
notably better than FM. I had the impression I was in the same
room with the broadcaster. It would be nice to hear an
uninterrupted stream for a half-hour to get a better sampling.
-=jd=-
--
My Current Disposable Email:
(Remove YOUR HAT to reply directly)