| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
November 14th 04, 10:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
"-=jd=-" wrote in message ... On Sat 13 Nov 2004 04:53:51p, "Frank Dresser" wrote in message t: "-=jd=-" wrote in message ... Back when I was toying with a DRM signal, I was able to get 10 to 15 seconds worth (before drop-out) with an unmodified PCR- 1000 simply be using ssb and tuning down a bit. I also had to set Dream to reverse some setting in the software that I can't recall at the moment. It was the only setting that allowed you to reverse/invert some aspect of the processing. -=jd=- Yeah, those were interesting posts. That's what triggered my thoughts on using a computer as a DRM detector with the 62 and feeding the signal back to radio's hi-fi audio section. The experiment would be cheap enough for me, and it's probably doable, but I'm just not interested enough in DRM to start playing with it. Frank Dresser The one thing I got to hear most of was the undecoded signal - As soothing as a bored 8-year old with a 100-foot length of bubble-wrap. But for 10 to 15 seconds at a time, the decoded signal quality was *scary* nice. I would have to say it was notably better than FM. I had the impression I was in the same room with the broadcaster. It would be nice to hear an uninterrupted stream for a half-hour to get a better sampling. -=jd=- -- My Current Disposable Email: (Remove YOUR HAT to reply directly) |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Comparing Four Great Communications Receivers | Shortwave | |||
| a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history | Policy | |||
| Means of building low quality receivers | Homebrew | |||
| Means of building low quality receivers | Homebrew | |||
Hybrid Mode
