Thread: BPL vs MW & LW
View Single Post
  #3   Report Post  
Old November 17th 04, 09:32 AM
JuLiE Dxer
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 12:23:49 GMT, "Frank Dresser"
wrote:

Interference aside, BPL would be a slick solution if it's reliable.
However, there hasn't been much evidence that BPL can deliver wide bandwidth
to a significant number of customers over a long period of time.


Now, I have seen just the opposite reported. Speeds lower than
typical, contemporary DSL/Cable with more susceptibility to
intereference. To note, it wont really be able to increase its
throughput once big companies like Verizon have mostly implemented
their FIOS (fiber) service at opening speeds at 5 Mbps downstream,
15Mbps and 30 Mbps downstream options as well. The techonology wont
allow for it to be competitive business-wise. This all works against
the money greedy pigs at the FCC/Power Companies' lies about QRM on
the RF spectrum slated to be used.