I think this Fractenna guy is ... ? ... or something. He managed to argue
here with everyone who asked him questions.

Now, does he really represent Fractal Antenna Systems?
http://www.fractalantenna.com/
All the patents mentioned on this Website have single author: Nathan Cohen.

If that's him and he makes all this noise on behalf of his company (pretty
unrealistic assumption anyway) ... this is not a good way to market
innovations, be it fractal antennas or anything.

They may be good innovations then, just hindered by his approach.

Andrey

PS: If someone has commercial request for Antenna design, I can help too - I
do it for living. No fractals, just whips, patches, dipoles, loops, arrays -
everything from the classic books. I am an older guy. And of course,
matching, tuning, conforming and any sorts of customization. I have several
patents too, though I do not think of them as anything special.


--
Andrey Gleener R&D Services Ltd.
4775 Gilpin Crt. Burnaby
BC V5G 3A1
Tel: 604 844 7578
EMail:







"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:54:57 +0100, "Mark"
wrote:

I've looked at the Fractantenna web site and there is only marketing info
available.

Hi Mark,

And the intent in being obscure, or coy, is another marketing
technique to churn a amateur newsgroup for commercial interest. When
drawn into these banalities, the marketeer then steers the sucker
through the maze of claims to elicit a public declaration "sure this
looks good." Once having secured this admission from the prospect,
the marketeer then has the leverage to ask "what is keeping you from
giving me your money?"

All very standard and by the book [consult the recent activities of
Mr. Spitzer, Attorney General for New York for other material found in
"the book"].

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC