Some Guy wrote: 
 What a load of horse ****. 
 
 You guys are acting as if the engines and flight control surfaces of 
 an aircraft are intimately tied to the plane's radio receiver, and the 
 slightest odd or out-of-place signal that it receives is enough to 
 send any plane into a tail spin. 
 
 All this while the air travel industry is considering allowing 
 passengers to use their own cell phones WHILE THE PLANES ARE IN FLIGHT 
 by adding cell-phone relay stations to the planes and allowing any 
 such calls to be completed via satellite.  So I guess the feeble 
 radiation by my FM radio (powered by 2 AAA batteries) is enough to 
 cause a plane to dive into the ocean, but the guy next to me putting 
 out 3 watts of near-microwave energy is totally safe. 
 
 What about my hand-held GPS unit?  Any chance me using it (during all 
 phases of a flight, which I do routinely) will result in a one-way 
 ticket to kingdom come? 
 
Too bad it's not that simple. But if you're really into this kind of 
argument, do a groups.google.com search of the sci.geo.satellite-nav 
newsgroup. There you'll find endless argument, speculation, and 
rationalization ranging from well informed to completely clueless. 
There's surely more than ample ruminating there to satisfy anyone, 
regardless of your orientation or clue level; it's surely not necessary 
to do it all over again here. 
 
 Getting back to the original question (poor to non-existant AM 
 reception), I understand the idea of aperature and long wavelenths of 
 AM radio and the size of airplane windows - but what about the effect 
 of ALL the windows on a plane?  Don't they create a much larger 
 effective apperature when you consider all of them? 
 
A bit larger, yes. But the attenuation inside is still very high, since 
the windows are extremely small and spaced very close, in terms of 
wavelength. Sort of like the screen of a screen room. 
 
  And since the 
 plane isin't grounded, isin't the exterior shell of a plane 
 essentially transparent to all RF (ie it's just a re-radiator) because 
 it's not at ground potential? 
 
No, being at "ground potential" plays no part in shielding. Currents and 
fields on the outside aren't magically allowed to violate basic laws of 
physics and migrate through a good conductor just because a shield isn't 
at "ground potential". For that matter, a box that is at "ground 
potential" at the bottom is nowhere near that potential a quarter 
wavelength up the side. No shield over a small fraction of a wavelength 
on a side could work if "ground potential" were a requirement. Yet 
room-sized shielded enclosures are routinely used into the microwave 
region. Try your own experiment. Turn your portable radio on, turn up 
the volume, put it into a sealed can, set it on a stool, and see how 
much you hear. 
 
Roy Lewallen, W7EL 
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 |