Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Some Guy wrote:
What a load of horse ****. You guys are acting as if the engines and flight control surfaces of an aircraft are intimately tied to the plane's radio receiver, and the slightest odd or out-of-place signal that it receives is enough to send any plane into a tail spin. All this while the air travel industry is considering allowing passengers to use their own cell phones WHILE THE PLANES ARE IN FLIGHT by adding cell-phone relay stations to the planes and allowing any such calls to be completed via satellite. So I guess the feeble radiation by my FM radio (powered by 2 AAA batteries) is enough to cause a plane to dive into the ocean, but the guy next to me putting out 3 watts of near-microwave energy is totally safe. What about my hand-held GPS unit? Any chance me using it (during all phases of a flight, which I do routinely) will result in a one-way ticket to kingdom come? Too bad it's not that simple. But if you're really into this kind of argument, do a groups.google.com search of the sci.geo.satellite-nav newsgroup. There you'll find endless argument, speculation, and rationalization ranging from well informed to completely clueless. There's surely more than ample ruminating there to satisfy anyone, regardless of your orientation or clue level; it's surely not necessary to do it all over again here. Getting back to the original question (poor to non-existant AM reception), I understand the idea of aperature and long wavelenths of AM radio and the size of airplane windows - but what about the effect of ALL the windows on a plane? Don't they create a much larger effective apperature when you consider all of them? A bit larger, yes. But the attenuation inside is still very high, since the windows are extremely small and spaced very close, in terms of wavelength. Sort of like the screen of a screen room. And since the plane isin't grounded, isin't the exterior shell of a plane essentially transparent to all RF (ie it's just a re-radiator) because it's not at ground potential? No, being at "ground potential" plays no part in shielding. Currents and fields on the outside aren't magically allowed to violate basic laws of physics and migrate through a good conductor just because a shield isn't at "ground potential". For that matter, a box that is at "ground potential" at the bottom is nowhere near that potential a quarter wavelength up the side. No shield over a small fraction of a wavelength on a side could work if "ground potential" were a requirement. Yet room-sized shielded enclosures are routinely used into the microwave region. Try your own experiment. Turn your portable radio on, turn up the volume, put it into a sealed can, set it on a stool, and see how much you hear. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Automotive Diversity Reception problems- 98 Corvette | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
How to connect external antenna to GE Super Radio III | Antenna | |||
Review: Amateur Radio Companion 3rd Edition | Antenna | |||
Reception in a tin can | Antenna |