View Single Post
  #9   Report Post  
Old August 27th 03, 01:52 AM
W5DXP
 
Posts: n/a
Default

wrote:
I do not see any flaw in step 7).


Try opening your eyes.

If the rate of energy flowing is zero, then there is no energy
flowing so there can not be any energy crossing the point.


There is no NET energy flow. There is plenty of component energy
flow as defined by Ramo & Whinnery's forward Poynting vector and
reflected Poynting vector. Why do you continue to ignore those
vectors? Why do you continue to ignore the wealth of knowledge
contained in light interference patterns?
--
73, Cecil
http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----