View Single Post
  #13   Report Post  
Old February 10th 05, 10:37 AM
Mike Coombes
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Looking at the ARRL Antenna book it seems that the angle of radiation is
pretty well fixed on the type of antenna.
"Ian White G3SEK" wrote in message
...
Cecil Moore wrote:
John wrote:
Can someone tell me please an easy way to calculate the optimum angle of
radiation from a transmitting antenna over a given path on the HF bands
(160m - 10m)?
OK, I guess its all to do with the height of the reflective layer in
play and the distance of the QSO but I'd really appreciate some clues to
how to work this out.


Try the propagation chapter in the ARRL Antenna Book.


That would be a very good introduction to modern software like W6ELPROP.
What it teaches you is that angles of arrival vary considerably, even for
one given path, for reasons ranging from time of day to time in the
11/22-year sunspot cycle.

Remember that the F-layer is constantly changing height, especially if
it's around around dawn and dusk at one of the reflection points. This
means that at certain times the propagation has to 'flip' from say 3-hop-F
to 4-hop-F, so the angle will flip too. And don't forget the E-layer, if
that's there too.

W6ELPROP will actually tell you what propagation modes are the most likely
at various times of day... and the reality is *much* more complicated than
the simple pictures shown in older books.

The ARRL Antenna Book does rather assume that you can put up any antenna
you can dream of; in which case, it will help you design the optimum
system. Ideally, the antenna needs to be able to adapt to the needs of the
moment.

But for most of us, it's much simpler than that. We can never achieve the
low angles that are sometimes needed for some of the most important paths,
so it simply comes down to doing the best we can. "Adaptability" comes
down to possibly having a second-choice antenna... which at certain times
may turn out to be better.

But even if we can't actually *do* anything about it, it's better at least
to understand that arrival angles (or conversely, optimum launch angles)
are actually very variable.



--
73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB)
http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek