Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looking at the ARRL Antenna book it seems that the angle of radiation is
pretty well fixed on the type of antenna. "Ian White G3SEK" wrote in message ... Cecil Moore wrote: John wrote: Can someone tell me please an easy way to calculate the optimum angle of radiation from a transmitting antenna over a given path on the HF bands (160m - 10m)? OK, I guess its all to do with the height of the reflective layer in play and the distance of the QSO but I'd really appreciate some clues to how to work this out. Try the propagation chapter in the ARRL Antenna Book. That would be a very good introduction to modern software like W6ELPROP. What it teaches you is that angles of arrival vary considerably, even for one given path, for reasons ranging from time of day to time in the 11/22-year sunspot cycle. Remember that the F-layer is constantly changing height, especially if it's around around dawn and dusk at one of the reflection points. This means that at certain times the propagation has to 'flip' from say 3-hop-F to 4-hop-F, so the angle will flip too. And don't forget the E-layer, if that's there too. W6ELPROP will actually tell you what propagation modes are the most likely at various times of day... and the reality is *much* more complicated than the simple pictures shown in older books. The ARRL Antenna Book does rather assume that you can put up any antenna you can dream of; in which case, it will help you design the optimum system. Ideally, the antenna needs to be able to adapt to the needs of the moment. But for most of us, it's much simpler than that. We can never achieve the low angles that are sometimes needed for some of the most important paths, so it simply comes down to doing the best we can. "Adaptability" comes down to possibly having a second-choice antenna... which at certain times may turn out to be better. But even if we can't actually *do* anything about it, it's better at least to understand that arrival angles (or conversely, optimum launch angles) are actually very variable. -- 73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Radiation angle vs turns count in a coil | Antenna | |||
Electromagnetic radiation | Shortwave | |||
Serious radiation questin | Antenna | |||
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | General | |||
Cardiod radiation pattern - 70 cm phased vertical dipoles | Antenna |