View Single Post
  #121   Report Post  
Old February 20th 05, 08:27 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

wrote:
K4YZ babbled his usual libelous filth on Feb 19, 9:10 am, to wit:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:


I have spoke with persons in California about issues that
peripherally involve you. You can insist that I haven't, but you are
big about denial of your own.


You "have spoke?" Does that mean you are a wheel?

Angwy widdle Stevie is babbling again in generalities,
nothing specific.

Who are these "persons in California?" Are they groups
or individuals? What identification can you give about
them? Are you going to refuse to identify them again?

What are the "issues?" What do they involve? How do
they "involve" me?

Widdle Stevie is BLUFFING again. Nothing specific was
said by him, yet he wants to imply badness of some kind.

No one can confirm or deny something that isn't identified.

It is "K4YZ" babbling a lot of libelous filth at anyone who he
feels gives him opposition to whatever "K4YZ" has posted.


It's only "libelous" if it's not true.


Nearly all of what widdle Stevie posts claiming others are
"lying" is itself a LIE.


It's not "libelous" or a "falsehood" if it's true.


Widdle Stevie's libelous charges are untrue, false, nothing
more than uncontrolled temper tantrums from someone
who cannot concentrate on subjects but must hurl trash
at the person of those opposing his opinions.


It's not about "opinions".


In reality it is.

Stevie should understand that his fantasyworld ideas and
rules do NOT apply to reality. His "definitions" of "right and
wrong" are NOT universal and are purely defensive reflexes
on his part against those who disagree with him.

Leonard H Anderson has uttered dozens of untruthful statements in
this forum. They have been archived.


Poor baby. Still angwy at discovering that PCTA extras can
NOT hurl libelous filth at NCTAs or those that disagree with
your concept of "right and wrong?"

Tsk, there ought to be LAW, ey? :-)

Oh, my, but what widdle Stevie thinks is a "comeback" is going
to come back and bite him...HARD. Stevie's libelous filth
outpourings against others are ALSO archived!

Sunnuvagun!

Leonard H Anderson has uses dozens of hateful, demeaning epithets
agains all others who oppose HIS "opinions" then cries "foul" when

done
back to him.


Poor baby Stevie. Can't handle it on newsgroups? :-)

No problem to widdle Stevie...he's a PCTA *extra* and can do
anything he wants in here! Call others names (like "Putz") and
say those are "true" (when they aren't)!

Tsk, tsk, tsk...an alleged ex-marine who can't handle "hostile
(verbal) action!"

Temper fry...


I don't have a "Licensed Practical Nurse certificate".


No longer? Tennessee take yours away? Aw, too bad...


It's not libelous if it's true.


It's not true. Ergo, it is LIBEL.


You are not a licensed Radio Amateur.


Never claimed to be one. :-)

You could have been a positive contributer to the Amateur Radio
community.


That would be a change...from all the negative contributors
who insist on keeping U.S. amateur radio in some kind of
time stasis circa 1930's standards and practices. :-)

But, I'd feel safe in predicting that widdle Stevie would
continue to throw tantrums and hurl libelous filth at all
who oppose his opinions in here. :-)

You claim it's a meaningful pursuit, but you obviously hate
everything about it and anyone connected with it.


Sigh...poor widdle self-righteous Stevie thinking that all
of amateur radio agrees with Stevie's concept of ham
radio. Anyone "hating Stevie" MUST "hate all of ham
radio!" :-)

You authored a few articles in a quasi-engineering level Amateur
Radio journal many years ago. None of those articles ever produced a
single bit of professional recognition.


BwahahahahahahahahahHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Poor widdle emotional Stevie...thinks it is all about
"recognition" and respect and, most of all, adoration!
:-)

"Professional recognition." Professionalism is about
doing work for pecuniary compensation. (those with
poor vocabularies can substitute 'monetary' for
'pecuniary') Tsk, tsk, tsk...all of the publications I
was printed in (there are 9 of them) "recognized" it as
such and I was PAID for them. Not only that, but the
IRS and California Franchise Tax Board also
"recognized" it as such!

Sunnuvagun!

You've contributed nothing to the technical development of

Amateur
Radio.


I haven't? :-)

What has widdle Stevie "contributed to the technical development
of amateur radio? Sitting in ham newsgroups and hurling libelous
filth against all who oppose him? :-)

Define "technical development" in radio, oh mighty radio guru!

Show us your work, your brilliant developments of buying ready-
built equipment and building "weekender" projects from articles
in ham magazines...no doubt all full of amazing technology
never before seen, ey? :-)


These are statements of fact. Unless you can produce some
documentary evidence to the contrary?


"Documentary evidence?" You mean like information printed at
a rate of 50,000 copies a month in some periodical? Or be a
footnote or endnote in some other paper or document?

Imagine poor widdle Stevie ending up as a mere footnote in
some article. [a podiatric medical journal would be suitable?]


Then if we use YOUR above statement/logic verbatim, why are YOU

in
THIS forum?


Does widdle Stevie have both short-term and long-term memory
loss? :-)

I'm here as part of an advocacy to remove the morse code test
from U.S. amateur radio license examinations. As part of that,
there are all those other libelous filth-hurlers best
identified as a group known as the "PCTA extras" who want to
silence me. As a result, most of my replies are in regards to
refuting all that libelous filth tossed at my person. :-)

You are not a licensed Amateur. You cannot, therefore, be
any kind of a judge of what Amateurs should do or how they should do
it.


NOBODY can tell widdle Stevie what to do in ham radio! Nobody!

:-)


with one of them since that retirement began. "K4YZ" has never
revealed "his source's" name. He can't. He doesn't exist.


I can, but I won't.


BLUFF. Bull****. You fabricated that "source." A LIE.

You left a very negative impression on persons who ARE engineers
and ARE qualified to judge. I know the other person. I've never

known
him to utter a single untruthful comment.


Tsk. Must have been one of your other personalities! :-)

Which one of those was it?


You are an antagonist.


Yes. I dislike the existance of the morse code test!

Did you finally come to that conclusion, Stevie Einstein?

:-)

You make statements that are not true or that you will not
substantiate with valid references.


Poor widdle Stevie...he MUST have long-term memory loss
also! He forgets a short list of professional employers made
in here more than once, the names and callsigns of licensed
amateurs whom I know, the links and other third-party
references made in here to documents, directives, and
regulations.

Poor Stevie, all confused again as to what is "right or wrong"
and personal fantasy versus reality. Thinks all who oppose
his opinions are "wrong," "liars," "untruthful," etc., etc.

Widdle Stevie is nutso.