N9OGL wrote: 
 K4YZ wrote: 
  N9OGL wrote: 
   K4YZ 
   By Todd Daugherty N9OGL 
 
       No...actually you've been citing a 20 meter frequency.  But 
 let's 
  not let facts interfere with your rant, Todd. 
 
 I was only on 20 meter for a short time because the tape got jammed 
in 
 the machine. But then MAJORITY of my transmissions were on 10 meters. 
 
Doesn't matter, Todd.  You've been "advertising" a 20 meter 
frequency. 
 
Despite your own appreciation of your net worth to Amateur Radio, 
I've not been searching the bands to see if you're illegally 
broadcasting elsewhere. 
 
   Unless you have a SUPER HAM STATION down there in 
   bum#### Tennessee I REALLY doubt you heard my weak signal. 
  
       (1)  I don't need a "SUPER HAM STATION", Todd. My very modest 
  station has worked DXCC very nicely from TN.  Even Illinois. 
  
       (2)  The "weakness" of N9OGL is not in the amount of RF being 
  radiated from the transmitter, but of the weakness of maturity and 
  competency of it's owner/operator. 
  
   So before 
   you get on a newsgroup call someone decietful, dishonest, lame, 
and 
 a 
   liar you better know what the #### your talking about. Because in 
 my 
   humble opinion your not only lying to these people but your lying 
 to 
   yourself. 
  
       I'm lying to neither...least of all you, Todd. 
  
       K1MAN HAS established a pattern of rules violations that 
MAY 
  permit the FCC to take some sort of action when his license comes 
up 
  for renewal in October.  This is not in debate since YOU have 
quoted 
  the very same incidents on your rants. 
 
 Warning Letter's are NOT the final action of the FCC, and as far as 
 I've seen thats all he has recieved so far. If he corrects the 
problem 
 then there is no problem. The problem is dumb hillbillies like 
yourself 
 who believe that information bulletins can't opinionated...which is 
NOT 
 TRUE. 
 
Is true.  You can rationalize it however you want, Todd, but 
"information" tainted with your "opinion" becomes editorial.  Your 
"editorial" is of no use to me or anyone else in the Amateur Radio 
Service. 
 
       N9OGL is starting on the same path.  Therefore, although the 
 "new 
  kid on the block", it is highly likely that he will accumulate the 
 same 
  record of warning letters, attention of federal law enforcement, 
and 
  scrutiny.  This too is true since you've already acknowledged that 
Mr 
  Hollingsworth is allegedly paying attention already. 
 
 Accually that was sent by someone CLAIMING TO BE HOLLINGSWORTH, it 
was 
 not sent by him. 
 
And you "know" he NOT paying attention to you...HOW...?!?! 
 
       N9OGL has made disparging references to other participants of 
 this 
  forum as "appliance operators", suggesting that HE is not.  He's 
been 
  asked to ante up to that insinuation but instead launched into this 
  diversion. 
  
       Didn't work. 
  
       N9OGL has made direct asserions of being an "inventor" but has 
 yet 
  to pony up a single "invention".  He DID make reference to an idea 
 for 
  a bottlenecked point-to-point data protocol that is at least four 
or 
  five "generations" of data transfer technology old. 
 
 First off it don't have to be bottlenecked IF it ran on one of higher 
 frequencies where there is commercial available equipment, Secondly I 
 have Posted SOME of my inventions on my website, N9OGL INVENTIONS. 
 
The fact still remains that your IDEA (not an invention) is a 
least three technology generations BEHIND current technology. 
 
In other words, of absolutely NO interest or use to anyone other 
than you and your ego. 
 
(Lennie could have a field day with this if he were really the 
technology guru he claims to be...we'll see....) 
 
       Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh....we're so UNimpressed. 
  
       He also created another "blog" for the purpose of enlightening 
 the 
  world as to his technical wizardry, but still has yet to make good 
on 
  that. 
 
 REALLY??? Look Again! 
 
I did! 
 
What a HOOT!  Your "inventions" had me laughing for quite while, 
Todd!  Thanks! 
 
       So...there's somone lying to himself here, Todd, and son, it 
 ain't 
  me. 
  
       Now...back to the REAL question at hand...What equipment makes 
 up 
  the station line-up at N9OGL? 
  
 
 Bottle line slimeball...(SNIP) 
 
"bottle line slimeball"...?!?! 
 
OH ! !   I GET IT ! ! !  One of your INVENTIONS! 
 
 I have built equipment, I have so many radio's I 
 DON'T USE THEM ALL. But I have Built 2 meter and 440 transmitters. 
 As a matter of fact I'm planning to put my information bulletin om 2 
 meter, and I'm going to build the transmitter for the bulletin 
station 
 on 2 meter. 
 
OK...So, tell us about them! 
 
You call others "appliance operators", yet you STILL have not 
provided a single bit of evidence of a single bit of non-commercially 
built equipment operating at N9OGL. 
 
       I say that if you can't answer THAT question in the very next 
  reply to this post, that you are proving exactly what I've been 
  alledging. 
  
  Steve, K4YZ 
 
 Todd N9OGL 
 
Not a single line of text devoted to describing ANY 
non-commercial equipment in operation at N9OGL. 
 
And in the end, you did exactly what I said you'd do...PROVED that 
my allegations of your own "appliance operator" status was valid. 
 
Thanks, Todd! 
 
Steve, K4YZ 
 
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 |