N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ
By Todd Daugherty N9OGL

No...actually you've been citing a 20 meter frequency. But
let's
not let facts interfere with your rant, Todd.

I was only on 20 meter for a short time because the tape got jammed
in
the machine. But then MAJORITY of my transmissions were on 10 meters.

Doesn't matter, Todd. You've been "advertising" a 20 meter
frequency.

Despite your own appreciation of your net worth to Amateur Radio,
I've not been searching the bands to see if you're illegally
broadcasting elsewhere.

Unless you have a SUPER HAM STATION down there in
bum#### Tennessee I REALLY doubt you heard my weak signal.

(1) I don't need a "SUPER HAM STATION", Todd. My very modest
station has worked DXCC very nicely from TN. Even Illinois.

(2) The "weakness" of N9OGL is not in the amount of RF being
radiated from the transmitter, but of the weakness of maturity and
competency of it's owner/operator.

So before
you get on a newsgroup call someone decietful, dishonest, lame,
and
a
liar you better know what the #### your talking about. Because in
my
humble opinion your not only lying to these people but your lying
to
yourself.

I'm lying to neither...least of all you, Todd.

K1MAN HAS established a pattern of rules violations that
MAY
permit the FCC to take some sort of action when his license comes
up
for renewal in October. This is not in debate since YOU have
quoted
the very same incidents on your rants.

Warning Letter's are NOT the final action of the FCC, and as far as
I've seen thats all he has recieved so far. If he corrects the
problem
then there is no problem. The problem is dumb hillbillies like
yourself
who believe that information bulletins can't opinionated...which is
NOT
TRUE.

Is true. You can rationalize it however you want, Todd, but
"information" tainted with your "opinion" becomes editorial. Your
"editorial" is of no use to me or anyone else in the Amateur Radio
Service.

N9OGL is starting on the same path. Therefore, although the
"new
kid on the block", it is highly likely that he will accumulate the
same
record of warning letters, attention of federal law enforcement,
and
scrutiny. This too is true since you've already acknowledged that
Mr
Hollingsworth is allegedly paying attention already.

Accually that was sent by someone CLAIMING TO BE HOLLINGSWORTH, it
was
not sent by him.

And you "know" he NOT paying attention to you...HOW...?!?!

N9OGL has made disparging references to other participants of
this
forum as "appliance operators", suggesting that HE is not. He's
been
asked to ante up to that insinuation but instead launched into this
diversion.

Didn't work.

N9OGL has made direct asserions of being an "inventor" but has
yet
to pony up a single "invention". He DID make reference to an idea
for
a bottlenecked point-to-point data protocol that is at least four
or
five "generations" of data transfer technology old.

First off it don't have to be bottlenecked IF it ran on one of higher
frequencies where there is commercial available equipment, Secondly I
have Posted SOME of my inventions on my website, N9OGL INVENTIONS.

The fact still remains that your IDEA (not an invention) is a
least three technology generations BEHIND current technology.

In other words, of absolutely NO interest or use to anyone other
than you and your ego.

(Lennie could have a field day with this if he were really the
technology guru he claims to be...we'll see....)

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh....we're so UNimpressed.

He also created another "blog" for the purpose of enlightening
the
world as to his technical wizardry, but still has yet to make good
on
that.

REALLY??? Look Again!

I did!

What a HOOT! Your "inventions" had me laughing for quite while,
Todd! Thanks!

So...there's somone lying to himself here, Todd, and son, it
ain't
me.

Now...back to the REAL question at hand...What equipment makes
up
the station line-up at N9OGL?


Bottle line slimeball...(SNIP)

"bottle line slimeball"...?!?!

OH ! ! I GET IT ! ! ! One of your INVENTIONS!

I have built equipment, I have so many radio's I
DON'T USE THEM ALL. But I have Built 2 meter and 440 transmitters.
As a matter of fact I'm planning to put my information bulletin om 2
meter, and I'm going to build the transmitter for the bulletin
station
on 2 meter.

OK...So, tell us about them!

You call others "appliance operators", yet you STILL have not
provided a single bit of evidence of a single bit of non-commercially
built equipment operating at N9OGL.

I say that if you can't answer THAT question in the very next
reply to this post, that you are proving exactly what I've been
alledging.

Steve, K4YZ

Todd N9OGL

Not a single line of text devoted to describing ANY
non-commercial equipment in operation at N9OGL.

And in the end, you did exactly what I said you'd do...PROVED that
my allegations of your own "appliance operator" status was valid.

Thanks, Todd!

Steve, K4YZ

Is true. You can rationalize it however you want, Todd, but
"information" tainted with your "opinion" becomes editorial. Your
"editorial" is of no use to me or anyone else in the Amateur Radio
Service.

Again dickhead, no where in the FCC rules does it state that
information bulletins can't be opinionated.....Like I said prove
it.....AS far as I seen the FCC even pretty much stated that in the
letter to K1MAN in 2004. Secondly, YOU don't represent the WHOLE
amateur radio community, You can believe all you want the bottom line
is I'm right. SO you and your little bitches can continue to bitch and
complain on here but that's all it will be, A bunch of little bitches
on a newsgroup complaining to themselves.

Todd N9OGL

N9OGL wrote (and just can't seem to ante up some attributes):


Is true. You can rationalize it however you want, Todd, but
"information" tainted with your "opinion" becomes editorial. Your
"editorial" is of no use to me or anyone else in the Amateur Radio
Service.

Again ####head, no where in the FCC rules does it state that
information bulletins can't be opinionated.....Like I said prove
it.....

Nothing to prove. You are not broadcasting "information". You're
offering editorial.

AS far as I seen the FCC even pretty much stated that in the
letter to K1MAN in 2004. Secondly, YOU don't represent the WHOLE
amateur radio community, You can believe all you want the bottom line
is I'm right.

Right about what? I never stated (and you're welcome to try and
find a post where I said otherwise) that I represent ANYone except
myself.

SO you and your little ###### can continue to ##### and
complain on here but that's all it will be, A bunch of little #######
on a newsgroup complaining to themselves.

Acutally, no one here is "complaining" to anyone.

We're very accurately pointing out what a profane, functionally
illiterate idiot you are.

So far, you've been doing a pretty good job of helping us do it,
too!

AND....we're doing it in an open, unmoderated, non-copyrightable
but very definitely traceable public forum.

So you go RIGHT ON AHEAD and keep telling us about all these
illegal broadcasts you're making, how you operate pirate TV and radio
stations, and how the FCC can go do themselves...

Steve, K4YZ

Nothing to prove. You are not broadcasting "information". You're
offering editorial

Like I said you little ham cop show me in the rules where editorial's
aren't allowed on the ham bands. From what I've read as long as the
program is amateur radio related and directed to the amateur radio
service it don't matter if Information or an editorial it's legal, but
hey, prove me wrong, you have not since all this began proved that I
am wrong.

N9OGL wrote:
Nothing to prove. You are not broadcasting "information". You're
offering editorial
Like I said you little ham cop show me in the rules where editorial's
aren't allowed on the ham bands. From what I've read as long as the
program is amateur radio related and directed to the amateur radio
service it don't matter if Information or an editorial it's legal,
but
hey, prove me wrong, you have not since all this began proved that I
am wrong.

Todd, I'd love to be able to make sense out of your posts, but you
continue, after having had it pointed out to you over and over, that
you keep failing to attribute quotes.

My 13 year old can tutor you if you'd like. She's very good and I
don't think she'd charge you all that much. You sure need the help.
Shall we set it up? She can take PayPal.

Steve, K4YZ

Nothing to prove. You are not broadcasting "information". You're
offering editorial

Like I said you little ham cop show me in the rules where editorial's
aren't allowed on the ham bands. From what I've read as long as the
program is amateur radio related and directed to the amateur radio
service it don't matter if Information or an editorial it's legal, but
hey, prove me wrong, you have not since all this began proved that I
am wrong.